Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Federal Court dismissed Mehmet Akar’s judicial review of an RPD refusal, finding no procedural unfairness and no unreasonable credibility errors.
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a refused refugee-related permanent residence application, finding the officer’s credibility concerns and the process were reasonable.
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of a Refugee Appeal Division decision, finding the credibility and police-interest findings reasonable and the fairness argument waived.
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of a RAD refugee decision, holding that the adverse credibility findings were reasonable and procedural fairness was not breached.
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a work permit refusal, holding the officer gave adequate procedural fairness and reasonably found misrepresentation under IRPA s 40(1)(a).
Appeal dismissed because, on an independent assessment, the proposed IFA (XXXX) is both safe and reasonable on a balance of probabilities: the appellant failed to rebut the IFA due to inconsistent and uncorroborated evidence and did not establish that the alleged persecutor had the means or motivation to locate or harm him in the IFA or that state protection would be unavailable.
Source excerpt
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a RAD refugee decision, finding no procedural unfairness and no unreasonable credibility or risk assessment.
The Court of Appeal for British Columbia dismissed the appellant’s challenge to convictions for sexual assault and uttering threats, finding no burden-shifting or material misapprehension.
The appeal is dismissed because although the RAD found the RPD unduly microscopic in parts of its credibility analysis, the appellant failed to establish on a balance of probabilities an ongoing or personalized risk of persecution or cruel and unusual treatment by Grand-Ravine gang members such that he is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.
Source excerpt
The RAD dismissed the appeal because on independent review the RPD's adverse credibility findings were supported by inconsistencies, lack of corroboration and implausibilities (including delay despite available visas and failure to provide material details); consequently the appellants failed to prove a real chance of persecution or other protected risk and are neither Convention refugees nor persons in need of protection.
Source excerpt
Explore more
