Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative law 2025 CF 1720

Hosain c. Canada (Sécurité publique et Protection civile)

ContrĂŽle judiciaire rejetĂ© : la Cour fĂ©dĂ©rale confirme la confiscation d’espĂšces non dĂ©clarĂ©es et retient qu’aucun vice d’équitĂ© procĂ©durale n’est dĂ©montrĂ©.

  • Judicial review
  • Seizure and forfeiture
  • Standard of review (reasonableness)
  • Procedural fairness
  • Currency declaration requirements
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2024 FC 1580

Shhadi v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)

The Federal Court upheld a ministerial review maintaining seizure and forfeiture of $31,290 for failure to report and insufficient proof of legitimate origin.

  • Seizure and forfeiture of currency
  • Proceeds of crime (money laundering) and terrorist financing act
  • Cross‑border currency reporting
  • Ministerial review under s 29
  • Standard of review (reasonableness)
  • Admissibility of affidavit evidence
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2024 FCA 147

Fedorenko v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Tribunal reasonably found the applicant failed to truthfully and timely declare the meat products under s.16(1) of the Health of Animals Act, the E311 card did not excuse non-disclosure at the PIK, and under the AAMP scheme absolute liability principles bar due diligence or mistake defences, so upholding the notice of violation and $1,300 penalty was reasonable.

  • Administrative monetary penalties
  • Failure to declare imports
  • Absolute liability
  • Standard of review - reasonableness
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2019 FC 751

Sharanek v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)

Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a currency-seizure appeal, finding no procedural unfairness and holding the Minister’s refusal of relief was reasonable.

  • Procedural fairness
  • Reasonableness review
  • Seizure of currency
  • Relief from forfeiture
  • Service of notice
  • Onus to prove legitimate source of funds
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2018 ONCA 493

R. v. Peters

The trial judge correctly applied the border detention test and found, on the evidence and on an objective assessment of the officer's belief, that the officer's initial questioning and x‑ray did not amount to detention; detention (and the obligation to inform of counsel) arose when the officer cut open the bags and discovered cocaine. The trial judge's factual findings were open to him and the sentence imposed fell within the established range and did not require mitigation for the abolition of accelerated parole review.

  • Detention
  • Right to counsel
  • Search and seizure
  • Exclusion of evidence
  • Importation of narcotics
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2015 FC 1183

Noahs Ark Foundation v. Canada

The Federal Court dismissed a motion to set aside a prothonotary’s order requiring counsel, finding no new matter, fraud, or procedural unfairness under Rule 399.

  • Representation of corporations (rule 120)
  • Setting aside orders (rule 399)
  • Proceeds of crime seizure
  • Ministerial review
  • Case management orders
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2014 FC 1216

Lillethun v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a forfeiture decision, finding the applicant had not shown a legitimate source for $20,000 USD hidden on entry to Canada.

  • Forfeiture
  • Failure to declare currency
  • Ministerial discretion
  • Reasonableness review
  • Judicial-review
  • Currency-reporting
Read case analysis
Proceeds of crime (money laundering) and terrorist financing act 2014 FC 270

Thériault v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)

The Federal Court dismissed Alain ThĂ©riault’s appeal, holding he was in actual possession of over CAD 10,000 when departing Canada and had to report it.

  • Cross-border currency reporting
  • Seizure and penalty
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Possession of currency
  • Cross-border-currency-reporting
  • Statutory-interpretation
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2013 FC 729

Da Huang v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)

Federal Court held that forfeiting all seized currency was unreasonable where only part of the funds was shown to be legitimate and remitted the matter for reconsideration.

  • Proceeds of crime (money laundering) and terrorist financing act
  • Cross-border currency and monetary instruments reporting regulations sor/2002-412
  • Ministerial discretion under s.29
  • Partial return of seized funds
  • Standard of review - reasonableness
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2012 FC 788

Lau v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)

Judicial review dismissed. The Federal Court held the Minister reasonably refused relief from forfeiture because the applicant did not establish the legitimate origin of seized funds.

  • Ministerial discretion under s29
  • Seizure and forfeiture of currency
  • Standard of review (reasonableness)
  • Reporting requirement s12
  • Origin and traceability of funds
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.