Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The court largely dismissed a document production application, ordering only limited disclosure of existing transloading and storage records in the defendants' possession, power or control.
The court dismissed strike and privilege-waiver applications, allowed amendments by consent, ordered updated document-verification affidavits, and permitted limited further discovery.
The court granted the respondent’s document-production application and dismissed the claimant’s cross-application for deficient legal basis and overbroad requests.
The court partly granted a family-law document production application, ordering corporate financial records and remuneration ledgers, but refused M.L.'s personal tax returns.
The court limited third-party and medical disclosure to periods the plaintiff consented to, finding no evidentiary basis for broader pre-accident records.
Court ordered production of communications between Applicant and UAP and of insurer correspondence about the policy (undertakings 1,3,4) because those materials are likely to lead to relevant evidence on causation and credibility and are within the scope of disclosure under Rules 14.08 and 18.18; court refused to order disclosure of what the Applicant now seeks from Mr. Young (undertaking 5) because that goes to the ultimate issue at trial and refused the broad request for all post-transaction benefits (undertaking 6) because the Respondents failed to show a direct transactional nexus suffici…
Source excerpt
The motion judge did not err in exercising discretion to dismiss the action where the appellant repeatedly failed to produce medical records referenced in her statement of claim despite a consent order and provided no reasonable explanation; proposed fresh evidence was properly excluded because it did not cure the deficiencies and the delay in production was unexplained and contrary to the interests of justice.
Source excerpt
Master Taylor addressed cross-applications for document production in a commercial supply dispute and ordered production of relevant third-party and text communications.
The court partly granted a family-law document production application, limiting disclosure to relevant records about the Steinbrunner Property, ICBC proceeds, trailer transfer, debts, and tax returns.
The motions judge erred because Malloy failed to adduce evidence showing the existence or trial relevance of Intact's internal policies or that those documents bore on the bad faith allegation; pleadings alone cannot justify broad production under Rule 14.01 and the production order was ambiguous and overbroad, therefore the order was set aside and costs awarded to Intact.
Source excerpt
Explore more
