Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family law 2016 BCSC 1345

D.S. v. W.D.G.

The court found the adult child remained a child of the marriage, but reduced support to $750 monthly and imposed shared tuition and counselling costs.

  • Child of the marriage
  • Full-time student
  • Variation of support (s.17)
  • Fcsg s.7 special expenses
  • Estrangement/alienation
  • Adult-child-support
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2013 FC 144

Wheeldon v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of SSHRC’s denial of a post-doctoral fellowship, finding no legitimate expectation of detailed feedback and no procedural unfairness.

  • Procedural fairness
  • Legitimate expectation
  • Standard of review
  • Reasonableness
  • Administrative remedies
  • Procedural-fairness
Read case analysis
Family law 2012 NSSC 68

Banfield v. Banfield

The court found attendance at Landmark East was necessary for Emily's best interests and constituted an extraordinary expense under s.7(1.1); the expense was reasonable relative to the parties' means; however, retroactive equal sharing for 2010/2011 would be unfair because Carolyn acted unilaterally and delayed the claim, so a limited retroactive order was made and ongoing costs will be shared 50/50 subject to verification; health expenses were not proven to exceed insurer reimbursement and thus no immediate sharing order was made but, if shown to exceed insurance, they will be shared equally.

  • Section 7 child support guidelines
  • Extraordinary expenses
  • Private school tuition
  • Health-related expenses
  • Custody
Read case analysis
Family law 2009 NSSC 365

Provost v. Marsden

Court held that a portion of the 2005 child support windfall was held by the Applicant under a fiduciary obligation for the children's benefit and that approximately $45,000 of the windfall (including a $21,000 educational fund and $24,000 budgeted for Applicant's dental work) must be treated as available for the children's special/extraordinary post‑secondary expenses; parties must deduct available funds (child contribution, USC, RESP, educational fund, dental allocation) from the eldest child's $14,318 first‑year budget and share any remaining deficit proportionally (65:35 based on incomes)…

  • Child support variation
  • Special/extraordinary expenses s.7
  • High income deviation s.4
  • Fiduciary obligations of parents
  • Resp/education funds
  • Trust characterization of maintenance
Read case analysis
Family law 2006 BCSC 625

Atkinson v. Atkinson

Court fixed post-secondary child support for an adult child at university, allowed limited retroactive variation, and apportioned expenses based on income and need.

  • Federal child support guidelines s.3(2)(b)
  • S.7(1)(e) expenses for post‑secondary education
  • Retroactive variation of support
  • Apportionment of post‑secondary expenses
  • Attribution of income
  • Child-support
Read case analysis
Family law 2000 BCSC 1173

Bainbridge v. Bainbridge

Courted varies child support under the Guidelines, dismisses the respondent’s request to reduce spousal maintenance, and reallocates certain extraordinary child expenses.

  • Child support guidelines
  • Section 7(1)(f) special/extraordinary expenses
  • Consent order variation
  • Registered education plan
  • Insurance coordination for medical expenses
  • Child-support
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.