A.S. v. Evergreen House Long Term Care
M.S. was lawfully admitted to EGH because the Public Guardian and Trustee provided substitute consent under s.22 HCCCFAA for an incapable adult; given that lawful admission and the regulatory framework governing residence and supervised leave, the petitioner failed to establish a legitimate ground to question the lawfulness of any deprivation of liberty, and habeas corpus is not the appropriate mechanism to relitigate the care team's decision to disqualify the petitioner as TSDM; the petition is dismissed.
Source excerpt
- Habeas corpus
- Involuntary detention
- Substitute decision-making
- Long-term care admission
- Consent to care
- Capacity assessment