Commisso v. Teck Coal Limited
The court dismissed Teck Coal’s summary dismissal application, finding material factual disputes on duty of care and causation required a trial.
- Duty of care
- Causation
- Summary trial
- Novel duty
- Statute bar
- Duty-of-care
Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The court dismissed Teck Coal’s summary dismissal application, finding material factual disputes on duty of care and causation required a trial.
The court found liability only for the second of two bus incidents, holding the driver failed to ensure the elderly plaintiff was seated before moving.
Court held Eaton Yale owed no duty of care to the driving public in these circumstances because mere participation in an EAP and knowledge of some on-premises drinking, without provision or condonation of alcohol or knowledge of observable impairment on the night in question, does not create the requisite proximity or special relationship; thus employer liability may not be extended to cover an employee’s independent off-duty driving after he returned home. Consequently the action against Eaton Yale must be dismissed. The court also held s.267(1) deductions apply to non-automobile defendants,…
Source excerpt
La Cour suprême rejette l’appel de la Couronne et refuse de reconnaître, en droit civil québécois, une action directe pour récupérer des paiements faits à des militaires blessés.
Appeal from a Quebec warranty action over a used truck’s defective brakes, latent defects, and whether a seller could be liable to both the purchaser and a third party.
Supreme Court of Canada held the appellants liable after a motorcycle struck a disabled trailer left on a highway, and upheld the damages award under Alberta’s Fatal Accidents Act.
Appeal in a negligence action by a housekeeper injured when she tripped over the employer’s dog on a basement stairway; the Supreme Court allowed the appeal and dismissed the claim.
The Supreme Court of Canada held that a salesman returning home from an employer-invited lecture was not acting in the course of employment, so the company was not vicariously liable.
The Supreme Court of Canada held that a rotten window sill could be a statutory defect causing a worker’s injury, and ordered a new trial only on damages.
The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed an appeal by Colpron’s children, holding the railway was exonerated under article 1054 C.C. because the accident was unforeseeable.
Explore more