Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Tort 2018 BCSC 2283

Commisso v. Teck Coal Limited

The court dismissed Teck Coal’s summary dismissal application, finding material factual disputes on duty of care and causation required a trial.

  • Duty of care
  • Causation
  • Summary trial
  • Novel duty
  • Statute bar
  • Duty-of-care
Read case analysis
Tort 2002 BCSC 1438

Lawson v. B.C. Transit

The court found liability only for the second of two bus incidents, holding the driver failed to ensure the elderly plaintiff was seated before moving.

  • Duty of care
  • Standard of care
  • Foreseeability
  • Causation
  • Damages assessment
  • Apportionment
Read case analysis
Torts C33677

John v. Flynn

Court held Eaton Yale owed no duty of care to the driving public in these circumstances because mere participation in an EAP and knowledge of some on-premises drinking, without provision or condonation of alcohol or knowledge of observable impairment on the night in question, does not create the requisite proximity or special relationship; thus employer liability may not be extended to cover an employee’s independent off-duty driving after he returned home. Consequently the action against Eaton Yale must be dismissed. The court also held s.267(1) deductions apply to non-automobile defendants,…

  • Duty of care
  • Proximate cause
  • Foreseeability
  • Employee assistance program
  • Collateral benefits deduction
  • Apportionment of liability
Read case analysis
Civil law [1965] RCS 164

La Reine v. Sylvain et al.

La Cour suprême rejette l’appel de la Couronne et refuse de reconnaître, en droit civil québécois, une action directe pour récupérer des paiements faits à des militaires blessés.

  • Quasi-delict
  • Loss of services
  • Subrogation
  • Per quod servitium amisit
  • Measure of damages
  • Prescription
Read case analysis
Motor vehicles [1953] 1 SCR 149

Modern Motor Sales Ltd. v. Masoud

Appeal from a Quebec warranty action over a used truck’s defective brakes, latent defects, and whether a seller could be liable to both the purchaser and a third party.

  • Warranty against latent defects
  • Negligence
  • Vicarious liability
  • Contribution/indemnity
  • Res judicata
  • Warranty-against-latent-defects
Read case analysis
Torts [1953] 1 SCR 66

Marsden Kooler Transport v. Pollock

Supreme Court of Canada held the appellants liable after a motorcycle struck a disabled trailer left on a highway, and upheld the damages award under Alberta’s Fatal Accidents Act.

  • Duty of care
  • Breach of statutory regulation (flares)
  • Causation
  • Assessment of damages under fatal accidents act
  • Vicarious liability
  • Illegitimacy and entitlement
Read case analysis
Labour law [1951] SCR 815

Gilmour v. Mossop

Appeal in a negligence action by a housekeeper injured when she tripped over the employer’s dog on a basement stairway; the Supreme Court allowed the appeal and dismissed the claim.

  • Negligence
  • Duty of care
  • Volenti non fit injuria
  • Contributory negligence
  • Reasonable safety of premises
  • Duty-of-care
Read case analysis
Labour law [1938] SCR 244

Dallas v. Home Oil Distributors Ltd.

The Supreme Court of Canada held that a salesman returning home from an employer-invited lecture was not acting in the course of employment, so the company was not vicariously liable.

  • Course of employment
  • Servant's negligence
  • Control test
  • Travel to and from work
  • Vicarious-liability
  • Course-of-employment
Read case analysis
Labour law [1934] SCR 333

Lewis v. Nisbet & Auld Ltd.

The Supreme Court of Canada held that a rotten window sill could be a statutory defect causing a worker’s injury, and ordered a new trial only on damages.

  • Employer liability
  • Workmen's compensation
  • Causation
  • Defect in premises
  • Contributory negligence
  • Damages assessment
Read case analysis
Torts [1934] SCR 189

Colpron v. The Canadian National Ry. Co.

The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed an appeal by Colpron’s children, holding the railway was exonerated under article 1054 C.C. because the accident was unforeseeable.

  • Negligence
  • Fait de la chose vs fait de l'homme
  • Defence of exoneration under article 1054 c.c.
  • Reasonable precautions
  • Foreseeability
  • Employer-liability
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.