Motor vehicle collision damages trial. The court found the accident materially caused ongoing physical and psychological injuries and awarded damages for pain, income loss, future care, and special damages.
The court found the defendant ran a red light, rejected contributory negligence, and awarded the plaintiff damages for serious physical, psychological, and future care losses.
Motor vehicle injury claim with admitted liability. The court found residual back pain and a moderate future income risk, awarding damages and costs to the plaintiff.
Considering the Appellant's chronic back pain, leg weakness, cognitive and mental health impairments, the treating physicians' unequivocal opinions that he is unfit for work, and real‑world barriers (limited education, minimal English, age, manual work history), the Tribunal concluded on a balance of probabilities that the Appellant was disabled (severe and prolonged) by the MQP (Dec 31, 2015); missing ancillary test results did not permit an adverse inference and did not overturn treating opinions.
Brar admitted liability for a car accident, but the court assessed the plaintiff's physical and psychological injuries and awarded damages, including income loss and future care.
British Columbia Court of Appeal upheld most of a personal injury damages award, finding no contributory negligence or error in future earning capacity, but reduced future care by removing nanny costs.
Motor vehicle injury trial assessing soft tissue damages, future earning capacity, future care, and mitigation. Plaintiff awarded damages, reduced 25% for failure to mitigate.