Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Interim parenting-time variation was dismissed, while the claimant obtained enforcement relief for child support, disclosure, CPP disability benefits, and parenting coordination.
In a child-support dispute, the court held that two adult daughters remained children of the marriage, rejected retroactive variation, and ordered ongoing support and arrears.
Summary trial in a family law dispute fixed shared-custody child support, upheld s. 7 expense sharing, and awarded retroactive relief and arrears.
Because the respondent refused to provide required financial disclosure and failed to pay support, the court imputed income under the Child Support Guidelines, calculated table and retroactive child support and s.7 expenses accordingly, ordered specific disclosure and insurance obligations, and awarded costs for respondent's non‑cooperation.
Source excerpt
The appeal is dismissed because the motion judge did not err in refusing an adjournment given the appellant's prior non‑compliance and adequate notice, the separation agreement was properly enforced notwithstanding ambiguity in the support clause (ambiguity does not void the entire agreement and relevant disclosure was available), the proposed fresh evidence failed the Palmer test, and the costs awards were appropriate and are affirmed.
Source excerpt
The court imputed $200,000 income to the claimant, refused retroactive child support variation, adjusted future support to $2,000 monthly, and varied parenting time.
The court terminated child support for both daughters, ended the related life insurance obligation, kept the special-expenses reimbursement protocol, and continued spousal support at $1,700 a month until May 30, 2017.
The court refused a mother's request to relocate her son from the Lower Mainland to Tennessee, finding the move was not in the child's best interests.
The court refused to move David Collins to his father on an interim basis, imputed income to both parents for support, and set access, arrears, and ancillary orders.
Stay denied because appellant failed to demonstrate irreparable harm (no realistic risk of default on the second mortgage given the scheduled payment), appellant's conduct in unilaterally reducing payments constituted a self-created stay and weighed against equitable relief, and the balance of convenience favored the respondent; therefore the Superior Court order must be complied with pending appeal and security for costs was not ordered.
Source excerpt
Explore more
