Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal challenging the refusal to set aside a consent dismissal and settlement, and upheld dismissal of a later duplicate action as abuse of process.
The court found on the evidence that the parties had a final binding agreement on or about January 20, 2025, that the claimant's January 16, 2025 offer (clarified as final) was accepted by the respondent through counsel's request to draft the amending agreement and by the respondent's conduct in exercising the increased parenting time, and that the terms of that final agreement are those in the draft final order dated February 21, 2025; the court therefore declared the agreement binding, ordered the final order filed and dispensed with the need for the respondent's signature, awarded costs to…
Source excerpt
The court refused an adjournment, enforced a mediated settlement for $70,000, ordered execution of a mutual release, and awarded $3,000 in special costs.
The court upheld a written settlement as valid and binding, rejected objections based on misdating, mistake, and duress, and ordered payment into court.
The motion judge correctly interpreted paragraph 10 to mean written confirmation from the Panama prosecutor that the criminal charges were at an end satisfied the condition precedent; there was no contractual requirement that Global ensure Panama's police or migration services had been notified of withdrawal of charges; the motion judge's interpretation attracted deference and no palpable and overriding error was shown; the fresh evidence was either obtainable earlier or not decisive, so the appeal was dismissed and the enforcement order upheld.
Source excerpt
The court enforced a mediated settlement in a wills and estates dispute, rejecting claims of mistake and ordering payment, a stay, and costs.
The motion judge correctly interpreted the parties' agreement based on the draft settlement documents and affidavit evidence, finding the filing of a proposal to creditors was a material agreed term; there was no extricable error of law warranting appellate reversal; the post hoc assignment did not affect terms unknown to the other party; and payment into court is permissible under Rule 72.03, therefore the appeal is dismissed and the motion judge's enforcement order stands.
Source excerpt
Family law trial on parenting, support, and condominium proceeds. The court kept the basic parenting schedule, adjusted Sundays, set support, and found an arrears settlement.
The appellant court held that the respondent unequivocally elected to treat the settlement as at an end by pursuing the action (obtaining default judgment) and therefore, under the common law doctrine of election, was precluded from enforcing the settlement; the motion judge erred in exercising discretion to enforce an agreement that no longer existed.
Source excerpt
The motion judge did not err in refusing the adjournment because the appellants failed to present any material indicating a real defence or prejudice warranting remittal; given the Minutes of Settlement admitting liability and disclaiming any claims, there was no basis to interfere with the discretionary refusal of an adjournment.
Source excerpt
Explore more
