The Federal Court granted default judgment and a site-blocking order against Soap2Day defendants, with safeguards and a process to extend relief to copycat sites.
The court dismissed a commercial tenancy injunction application, finding no sufficient irreparable harm, balance of convenience against relief, and concerns about regulatory compliance.
The appeal is dismissed because the application judge correctly interpreted s.2.8 of the registered Heritage Easement Agreement, found the appellant breached the Agreement by altering the lands (removing trees, regrading, installing a concrete pad and cabana) without City approval, and reasonably concluded that remedial entry, declaratory relief and a permanent injunction were warranted; the City's discretion under the Agreement is subject to good faith limits and there was no evidence of capricious or arbitrary conduct.
The court refused interlocutory injunctions sought by Ladysmith Maritime Society to stop abandonment of a head lease and termination of its marina licence.
The Supreme Court of British Columbia granted White Rock a statutory injunction requiring the Mashianas to remove unauthorized encroachments on City highway land.
The Federal Court approved a protocol governing non-class counsel in a First Nations settlement and made prior communication restrictions permanent during implementation.
The court found the plaintiff was constructively dismissed (termination by employer), the dismissal was wrongful because there was no just cause or notice, and awarded contractual severance ($2,000,000 USD) plus unpaid remuneration, indemnification under D&O insurance, delivery of shares and options, seven months' notice damages, costs including special costs, prejudgment interest and a preservation injunction to prevent transfer of funds.
Neighbour dispute over a shared well, trespass, nuisance, harassment and privacy claims. The court dismissed the plaintiffs’ claims and allowed the counterclaim in part.
The Court of Appeal dismissed Ms. Allen’s applications for leave to appeal and a stay of financial terms attached to an injunction involving seized animals.
The court held the restrictive-covenant dispute should proceed under s. 35 of the Property Law Act with notice to affected owners, and continued the interim injunction.