Mid-trial, the court dismissed an application to bar the claimant from the home, finding the renewed trespass theory was an abuse of process and the facts remained unresolved.
The court dismissed an urgent application for a mandatory injunction to postpone a Conservative Party nomination meeting, finding no strong prima facie case and no basis to intervene.
TELUS sought an interlocutory injunction against Shaw's “Fibre+” internet branding, alleging misleading advertising under the Competition Act. The court denied the application.
On the affidavit evidence the Band demonstrated a serious issue to be tried, likely irreparable harm because alleged tortious and criminal conduct cannot be adequately remedied by damages, and the balance of convenience favored the Band; accordingly an ex parte interim injunction against unnamed persons and authorizing police enforcement was justified and granted until the next appearance.
The court dismissed One Touch’s application for an interlocutory injunction to stop Bell from terminating dealer agreements, finding no irreparable harm and that the balance of convenience favoured Bell.
The court dismissed requests to enforce non-compete and non-solicitation clauses against a former employee, finding the restraints overbroad and irreparable harm unproven.
The court refused most of an employer’s injunction request against departing investment advisors, but ordered return of specific plaintiff-originating data still retained in systems.