Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The court allowed redactions in tenant complaint documents, finding the withheld details were not relevant to the pleadings and would risk privacy harm and harassment.
The court granted a $200,000 interim distribution to fund a family law trial, but dismissed a production request for corporate and trust documents.
The court ordered sale of the Kelowna property, denied a transfer of trial to Abbotsford, and required disclosure of unredacted credit card statements.
Disclosure relevance is governed by trial‑level relevance; the Eskasoni and Bear River particulars post‑date and are unrelated to the transaction and relationship between MFCS and Sipekne’katik when the Indian Brook office was planned, built and used, and therefore do not bear on the parties’ reasonable expectations or public policy considerations relevant to the juristic reason inquiry and are not producible.
Source excerpt
Because the Crown consented to the hearing and a material change in circumstances was established by the disclosure-caused trial delay and the applicant's compliance and employment, limited variations to the house arrest were justified; however the secondary and tertiary grounds still supported retention of GPS monitoring for deterrence and security, so the court permitted narrowly defined unsupervised attendance for work and limited personal leave but retained all other original conditions including GPS monitoring.
Source excerpt
The court dismissed the defence request for further particulars in a daycare neglect prosecution, while allowing the Crown to amend the indictment to specify a safe environment.
The court refused to impute income to G.K., found child support should follow his reported income, denied spousal support, and addressed foreign property and consent orders.
The court ordered Eastside Pharmacy Ltd. the same document disclosure obtained by Community Outreach Pharmacy Ltd. in related judicial review proceedings.
The court reviewed spousal and child support, imputed income to both parties, ordered proportional dental expenses, and referred disputed law school costs to the registrar.
The Tribunal applied the low threshold of arguable relevance and its broad statutory procedural discretion to order disclosure in part: CN must produce 2015 and current policies on accommodation and human rights/anti-discrimination, the 2015 harassment policy (if different from the already-disclosed 2012 version), targeted training materials used in Edmonton (2015 and current as specified), and training records up to 2015 for five named CN employees; the Tribunal found CN had met its disclosure obligation for internal communications and that CN’s Schedule B descriptions of Dentons communicati…
Source excerpt
Explore more
