Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Tax Court compelled the appellants to answer follow-up questions on undertakings in GST/HST appeals, finding the questions proper and awarding $500 costs against each appellant.
In a WESA s. 60 wills variation dispute, the court ordered the deceased plaintiff’s estate to disclose a statement of assets and liabilities as of death, with supporting documents.
The court found the appellant had satisfied the undertaking after providing a supplemental response and extended the deadline; the respondent's motion to compel further answers regarding assumptions was dismissed as answered, but the respondent was granted a limited right to serve a list of what it considers findings of fact in Mariano and to require the appellant to state, by affidavit, whether he is aware of any differences as to each listed item; the appellant may not object that a listed item was not a finding of fact but may object that it is a finding of mixed fact and law; timelines fo…
Source excerpt
The court ordered production of insurer correspondence about coverage denial and allowed further discovery on insurance coverage, finding it relevant to settlement and compellable under the Civil Rules.
The court granted some particulars concerning alleged consideration, tax payments and changed position, but refused demands aimed at proving knowledge, consent and intent. Leave for interrogatories was denied.
The court dismissed a request to examine a second bank representative and refused more discovery time, but ordered overdue discovery responses by October 16, 2020.
The court dismissed the plaintiff’s action for repeated failure to produce an amended list of documents and for disobeying a prior order, finding no lawful excuse under Rule 22-7.
The court partly granted an estate-action document production application, narrowing some requests by time period, requiring specific production from records holders, and awarding no costs.
The Federal Court granted a protective order in part in a patent case, accepted a counsel’s eyes only regime, and rejected the proposed prosecution bar.
The Federal Court granted BC Hydro’s motion for a protective order covering confidential discovery materials in a patent infringement case.
Explore more
