Naugle v. Canada (Attorney General)
On the facts the arresting officer lacked objectively reasonable and probable grounds to arrest the plaintiff for obstruction; because the arrest was unlawful the statutory justification in s.25(1) could not apply and the officer's application of force was excessive, giving rise to civil liability for tortious battery and findings of Charter ss.7 and 9 breaches; costs awarded to the plaintiff.
Source excerpt
- Obstruction (criminal code s.129)
- Warrantless arrest (criminal code s.495(1))
- Use of force justification (criminal code s.25(1))
- Tortious battery
- Charter ss.7 and 9
- Credibility assessment