Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
In an extradition disclosure ruling, the Court ordered targeted disclosure about CBSA-related materials and the applicant’s police statement, but refused broader speculative requests.
In an extradition disclosure application, the court dismissed claims for charter-based and Canadian-gathered-evidence disclosure, finding no air of reality to alleged foreign investigative activity in Canada.
The Court of Appeal addressed jurisdiction, abuse of process, and vagueness in extradition proceedings, ultimately allowing the appeal by majority and setting aside the invalidity declaration.
The Supreme Court of British Columbia refused extradition committal for James Ellingson, finding the certified record too sparse to support an inference linking him to Silk Road drug sales.
The Federal Court allowed interlocutory review of an Immigration Division disclosure ruling, but found the ID reasonably lacked jurisdiction over a disguised extradition claim.
The Federal Court granted only part of Jean-Marc Murat’s motion to amend his claim, allowing limited additions tied to false imprisonment and Charter allegations, but rejecting disguised-extradition and defamation-related amendments.
The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to satisfy s.679(3)(b): he remains a significant flight risk who is unlikely to surrender into custody; the proposed surety was previously found unsuitable by a trial judge, nothing material has changed, electronic monitoring is insufficient to mitigate the risk, and the strength of the case and proximity to surrender increase his incentive to flee.
Source excerpt
In this extradition committal hearing, the court found sufficient circumstantial evidence that Sari participated in transactions benefiting Mahan Air and ordered committal.
Disclosure dismissed for lack of nexus; committal upheld because the private use exception is a defence outside the committal judge's limited role (and alternatively consent was tainted by an exploitative relationship); Minister's surrender decision was reasonable and consultation with IRCC was meaningful.
Source excerpt
Bail pending appeal is refused because, notwithstanding one arguable ground regarding admission of expert evidence, the applicant failed to demonstrate he will surrender (credible surety lacking, significant flight incentives and resources, history of non‑compliance), and release would undermine public confidence given the seriousness and nature of the offences and multiplicity of outstanding charges and extradition proceedings.
Source excerpt
Explore more
