Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Federal Court allowed judicial review of a refused provincial-nominee visa application, holding the officer failed to apply the Canada–PEI Agreement’s mandatory presumption.
Federal Court held a visa officer could refuse a Quebec investor application for lack of intent to reside in Quebec, but breached fairness by ignoring key evidence.
The Federal Court dismissed Francoeur’s judicial review, holding that the Public Service Superannuation Act offset applied because he was entitled to a Quebec disability pension, even though it was paid to the SAAQ.
The Federal Court dismissed a jurisdictional motion and a cross-motion arising from an LCBO mark-up collected by CBSA, holding the dispute turned on provincial law.
The Federal Court quashed a CPP deduction decision because the record did not show the mandatory written provincial agreement required by the Regulations.
The impugned provision s.2(9) of the Operating Agreement is a valid exercise of Parliament's exclusive spending power under s.91(1A) and forms part of the unassailable core of that power; therefore by virtue of interjurisdictional immunity the Ontario Human Rights Code does not apply to CMHC or to s.2(9), and the Board of Inquiry had no jurisdiction to add CMHC as a respondent.
Source excerpt
GECA incorporates provincial workers' compensation 'rates and conditions' that are reasonably incidental to compensation and not in conflict with GECA; s.187 of the Nova Scotia Workers' Compensation Act is such a provision and therefore applies to federal employees under GECA. WCAT correctly applied s.187 to resolve evenly balanced medical evidence in favour of the claimant and awarded survivor benefits; the appeal is dismissed.
Source excerpt
The Federal Court held that the Commissioner and AJEFO had standing, found Part IV OLA and Charter language-rights breaches in the Contraventions Act scheme, and granted mandatory relief.
Because the Harbour Authority was a tenant in possession under a valid lease, invoiced the respondent and provided berthage, the adjudicator did not err in finding an implied contract to pay; accordingly the claim arose under contract and within the Small Claims Court's s.9 jurisdiction. The appeal to this Court was permissible because the action was commenced before the statutory abolition of further appeals; Supreme Court decision was set aside and the Small Claims judgment restored.
Source excerpt
The Supreme Court of Canada held that a board with concurrent provincial and federal powers need not specify on the face of each order the source of its authority.
Explore more
