Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2024 BCSC 2623

R. v. Anderson

The court found Troy Terry Guerard Anderson guilty of arson and assault, accepting eyewitness evidence, expert fire evidence, and circumstantial proof linking him to the fire.

  • Arson (s.433(a) criminal code)
  • Assault (s.266 criminal code)
  • Circumstantial evidence
  • Credibility and witness assessment
  • Expert opinion on fire cause
  • Arson
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2024 BCSC 1474

R. v. Spencer

The court found the Crown proved arson by circumstantial evidence, but accepted expert evidence that Brian Edmund Spencer was NCRMD because of schizoaffective disorder.

  • Arson
  • Ncrmd (s.16)
  • Actus reus
  • Mens rea
  • Circumstantial evidence
  • Expert opinion
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2023 BCSC 1174

R. v. Aster

The court acquitted Justin Kyle Aster of five arson and criminal negligence counts after finding the Crown had not proved beyond a reasonable doubt that he set the Econo Lodge fire.

  • Criminal negligence causing death
  • Arson - disregard for human life
  • Circumstantial evidence
  • Expert opinion evidence
  • Mixed statement rule
  • Standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2011 NSSC 364

R. v. Boucher

The Crown did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Boucher set the fire because the circumstantial evidence did not exclude reasonable alternative inferences; motive and opportunity, without proof of exclusive opportunity or direct evidence, are insufficient for conviction under s.435.

  • Arson for fraudulent purpose
  • Circumstantial evidence
  • Burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt
  • Intent to defraud
  • Presumption of innocence
Read case analysis
Torts 2007 BCSC 1835

Wong v. Mislang

The court dismissed a negligence claim arising from a house fire, finding insufficient evidence that the defendants’ household caused the fire by careless smoking.

  • Cause and origin of fire
  • Careless smoking
  • Causation
  • Evidence weight
  • Expert evidence
  • Negligence
Read case analysis
Tort 2006 BCSC 758

Mazar et al v. Ploy Enterprises Ltd. et al.

The plaintiffs alleged a fire was caused by defective electrical wiring in a commercial building, but the court found they had not proved causation and dismissed the action.

  • Cause of fire
  • Standard of care
  • Expert evidence
  • Causation
  • Damages
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Tort law 2003 BCSC 1052

Davies, Ducharme and Greidanus v. Pedersen

The court dismissed mutual assault claims, found Pedersen civilly liable for starting the fire, awarded punitive damages of $10,000, and dismissed his counterclaims except rent.

  • Assault and battery
  • Arson (civil liability)
  • Punitive damages
  • Malicious prosecution
  • Abuse of process
  • Standard of proof in civil cases involving alleged crimes
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2003 NSSC 117

R. v. Dearing

The accused was proven beyond a reasonable doubt to have intentionally set the fire as a party with his brother based on the tape confession and corroborating circumstantial evidence; however the Crown failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the fire was set with the specific intent to defraud the insurer, so the accused is convicted of arson (s.434) and acquitted of insurance fraud (s.435).

  • Arson
  • Insurance fraud
  • Confession evidence
  • Credibility assessment
  • Party to offence
  • Mens rea
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.