Damages trial from an admitted-liability collision. The court awarded compensation for mild TBI/concussion, chronic pain, PTSD, housekeeping loss, earning loss, and future care.
The court dismissed a request for a jointly retained forensic expert and broad third-party disclosure, finding the existing evidence sufficient and the requests overbroad.
On the whole of the evidence the Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Mullins misappropriated funds from the Sydney Garrison Messes: the forensic accounting analysis established a significant unexplained inventory/sales shortfall, cash and unofficial receipts were found under his control without supporting documentation, and his credibility on explanations (spoilage, bookkeeping error, third‑party theft) was rejected; accordingly guilty verdict on count one and a stay on count two under Kienapple/Hammerling.
The court varied interim child and spousal support after a forensic accounting report showed much higher historical income, imputing the respondent at $200,000.
On the totality of the forensic audit, documentary records, witness evidence about Ms. Lee's duties and opportunity, her signatures/initials on deposit slips and Provider Payment Summaries, inconsistent testimony, and inculpatory admissions in her police interview, the only rational inference beyond a reasonable doubt is that Sherri Dawn Lee intentionally stole $66,939.58 from Embrace Spa and committed the related frauds by misapplying Blue Cross payments and by back-dating on-accounts; convictions entered on Count 1 (theft), Count 3 (fraud under $5000) and on Count 2 the included offence of…
The court dismissed fraud and theft charges against Elain T. Bob, finding the Crown had not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that she was responsible for the missing funds.
The court found that a former Legion bookkeeper wrongfully converted funds by altering payroll cheques and issuing unauthorized cheques, and awarded damages plus bank charges.
The court set aside an interlocutory Mareva injunction after finding no material non-disclosure, but holding the balance of convenience no longer justified freezing assets.
Application by an accountant to strike allegations about matrimonial settlement advice was dismissed; the court found a triable issue on the applicable standard of care.
The court found the contractor overbilled on a cost-plus home project, awarded the owners recovery for overpayment and limited deficiency costs, and held him not liable for the failed copper roof.