Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2025 BCSC 1591

R. v. Johnson

Sentencing for assault with a weapon and dangerous driving arising from a vehicle incident at a Victoria protest. The court imposed 12 months’ imprisonment, concurrent 30 days, and probation.

  • Assault with a weapon
  • Dangerous driving
  • Conditional sentence
  • Aggravating factors
  • Mental health mitigation
  • Probation and ancillary orders
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2012 NSSC 319

R. v. Feltmate

Because the offence was racially motivated and caused community harm beyond the individual victim, denunciation and deterrence required a custodial sentence despite the guilty plea and mitigating personal circumstances; a 60-day period of incarceration for criminal harassment, 12 months probation with standard conditions, one day custody for the assault (time served), a three-year firearms prohibition and no DNA order or fine were reasonable and proportionate.

  • Criminal harassment
  • Assault
  • Aggravating factors - racial motivation
  • Denunciation and deterrence
  • Probation
  • Firearms prohibition
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2011 BCSC 1401

R. v. Stalker

Sentencing reasons for a nightclub assault and threat case. The court found the assault unprovoked and partly motivated by prejudice, and imposed custody plus ancillary orders.

  • Aggravated assault
  • Uttering threats
  • Self-defence
  • Aggravating and mitigating factors
  • Weapons prohibition
  • Dna order
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2010 BCSC 841

R. v. Kandola

Sentencing reasons after a guilty plea to assault causing bodily harm, addressing hate motivation, pretrial custody credit, probation, and ancillary orders.

  • Assault causing bodily harm
  • Section 718.2(a)(i) aggravating factor (hate motivation)
  • Credit for pretrial custody
  • Dna order (designated offence)
  • Probation conditions
  • Aggravating and mitigating factors
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2009 ONCA 175

R. v. Bradley

The appellate court dismissed the parity argument because the co-accuseds' actions and records differed materially; R. v. Thornton's malfeasance principle did not apply but the trial judge reasonably limited two-for-one pre-trial credit based on the appellant's role, lack of accepted remorse and extensive violent record; therefore the sentence was fit and affirmed.

  • Pre-trial custody credit
  • Parity in sentencing
  • Malfeasance principle
  • Joint enterprise
  • Aggravating factors (racial motivation)
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2001 BCCA 745

R. v. Nikkel

British Columbia Court of Appeal appeal from sentence in a manslaughter case; the court found the sentences fit and dismissed both appeals.

  • Manslaughter
  • Sentencing principles
  • Aggravating factors (racial bias, gang activity)
  • Pre-trial custody credit (two-for-one)
  • Youth offender sentencing
  • Remorse
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.