Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Federal Court held that the 276 Patent was ineligible for listing because Claim 58 did not claim the very change in use approved by the SNDS-related NOC.
The Federal Court held the Minister reasonably listed Serono’s patent on the date it was found eligible, not the submission date, and dismissed the judicial review.
The Minister reasonably interpreted and applied subsection C.08.004.1(1) of the Food and Drug Regulations consistent with binding prior Federal Court of Appeal authority; CUSMA does not amend domestic legislation or displace that interpretation; SPRAVATO is not an 'innovative drug' under subsection C.08.004.1(1) and is therefore not entitled to data protection, so the appeal is dismissed.
Source excerpt
Federal Court dismissed an interlocutory stay motion concerning Health Canada’s NOC for Médunik’s Ruzurgi, finding no clear irreparable harm and that convenience favoured the respondents.
The Federal Court set aside Health Canada’s refusal to issue a Certificate of Supplementary Protection for GSK’s SHINGRIX patent and remitted the matter for redetermination.
The Federal Court granted judicial review of a PMPRB decision, quashed the Board’s ruling, and held the Board had misapplied the statutory inquiry under s. 79(2).
La Cour fédérale a rejeté la demande de contrôle judiciaire d’Apotex, concluant que l’exigence de renseignements supplémentaires sur l’intégrité des données était ni entachée par l’import ban ni déraisonnable.
Court held the non-competition covenant unenforceable for overbreadth, dismissed the non-solicitation claim, and found the damages clause to be a penalty.
The Federal Court dismissed Photocure’s judicial review, upheld the Minister’s refusal of data protection for CYSVIEW, and excluded the competing expert affidavits.
The Federal Court dismissed Shire’s motion to strike affidavit evidence and to file reply evidence in a PM(NOC) proceeding, finding no clear error in the prothonotary’s order.
Explore more
