Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2019 NSSC 193

R. v. Balfe

Given the offender's severe and complex untreated mental illnesses at the time of the offences, his diminished moral culpability, youth, guilty pleas and sustained treatment progress, rehabilitation was given primacy over parity and general deterrence; a fit sentence is concurrent federal terms of 2 years on six counts with 3 years probation, with credit of 461 days for prior house arrest and pre-trial custody reducing actual custodial exposure to approximately 9 months.

  • Mitigation
  • Parity
  • Diminished culpability
  • Pre-sentence report
  • Credit for pre-trial custody
  • Ancillary orders
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2014 NSPC 93

R. v. Caverley

Given the aggravating nature of entering an occupied home with weapons and causing substantial damage and intimidation, and despite mitigating factors (limited records, remorse, employment, family), custodial sentences promoting denunciation and deterrence were required: two years imprisonment for each s.349 offence, three months concurrent for damage to the home, and four months consecutive for damage to the van; conditional sentences were not legally available for the s.349 counts and concurrent/consecutive structure applied to reflect transactional connection and temporal separation betwee…

  • Unlawfully in a dwelling (s.349)
  • Mischief/damage to property (s.430)
  • Concurrent and consecutive sentences
  • Dna collection orders
  • Victim surcharge
  • Restitution
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2014 BCSC 1659

R. v. Anderson

The court found both accused guilty of a violent home-invasion-style offence and rejected Gunness’s self-defence account, imposing custodial sentences with DNA and firearms orders.

  • Breaking and entering
  • Assault
  • Self-defence
  • Sentencing principles
  • Firearms prohibition
  • Dna order
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2013 ONCA 572

R. v. Hill

The Court upheld the sentence because the trial judge properly considered the mental health and risk assessment showing the appellant was at high risk to re-offend and applied sentencing objectives appropriate to a violent home invasion; given the broad range of appellate precedent, the resulting eight-year sentence (plus nine months pre-trial custody) was not demonstrably unfit.

  • Sentence fitness
  • Public protection
  • General deterrence
  • Denunciation
  • Risk assessment
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2012 NSPC 96

R. v. French

Because the offence involved a planned home invasion and sexual assault of a vulnerable elderly victim, the accused's significant prior record for sexual offences, the expert evidence indicating high risk of future violent and sexual recidivism and the limited prospects for safe community rehabilitation, a custodial sentence of eight years concurrent, with one-to-one remand credit and ancillary prohibitory and registration orders, is the fit and proportionate sentence.

  • Break and enter
  • Sexual assault
  • Sentencing principles
  • Risk assessment
  • Aggravating and mitigating factors
  • Soira
Read case analysis
Criminal law C44314

R. v. Wright

The court concluded the trial judge did not err in finding that appellate authorities indicated an upward movement in sentencing for home invasions and that, given the facts (planned armed home invasion, confinement and terrorizing of occupants, significant emotional harm) and offender-specific mitigation, an eight-year sentence was fit; the appeal is dismissed.

  • Robbery with a firearm
  • Being disguised with intent to commit an indictable offence
  • Sentencing range for home invasion
  • Deterrence and denunciation
  • Parity in sentencing
  • Pre-trial custody credit
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2005 BCSC 978

R. v. Araki and Ryan

Given the planning, extreme gratuitous violence, use of a firearm and severe injuries, the offences attract a high degree of moral culpability; an appropriate starting point is eight years; after applying double credit for substantial pretrial custody the sentences are reduced to concurrent terms of five years two months for Araki and five years for Ryan; mandatory and discretionary life weapons prohibitions and a DNA order are warranted; victim fine surcharge waived.

  • Sentencing principles
  • Aggravating and mitigating factors
  • Joint criminal enterprise/party liability
  • Pretrial custody credit (double credit)
  • Weapons prohibition
  • Dna orders
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2005 NSSC 122

R. v. Pinch

Starting from the low end of the Court of Appeal range for home invasions (eight years), the court applied a 25% reduction for guilty pleas, additional credit for seven months pre-trial custody (applied within a 2:1 to 3:1 framework), and a further reduction of 1.5 years for substantial cooperation with police, and concluded that a global custodial sentence of four years and six months in a federal institution was appropriate; the court also ordered a DNA order and imposed a lifetime prohibition on possession of weapons under s.109(1)(a).

  • Guilty plea credit
  • Pre-trial custody credit
  • Credit for cooperation with authorities
  • Application of s.348.1 aggravating factors
  • Totality principle
  • Dna order
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2002 BCCA 336

R. v. D.A.W.

The British Columbia Court of Appeal dismissed a sentence appeal arising from a violent home invasion robbery and upheld a 10-year global sentence.

  • Appellate review of sentence
  • Sentencing range
  • Deterrence
  • Rehabilitation
  • Parole considerations
  • Victim impact
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2002 BCCA 190

R. v. Kelly

The Court of Appeal reduced a six-year sentence for break and enter, sexual assault, threatening to use a weapon, and confinement to four years, stressing the offender’s youth and Gladue/Wells principles.

  • Sentencing principles
  • Gladue considerations
  • Denunciation and deterrence
  • Range of sentences for sexual assault
  • Conditional sentence
  • Rehabilitation
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.