Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of an H&C refusal, finding the officer reasonably assessed medical evidence, BIOC, and alternate ways to remain in Canada.
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a refused H&C application, finding the officer reasonably weighed establishment, hardship, and prior credibility findings.
The Federal Court set aside PRRA and H&C refusals after finding internally inconsistent factual findings, and held the H&C hardship analysis wrongly excluded country-risk evidence.
The Federal Court granted judicial review of an H&C refusal, finding the officer applied an exceptionality test, misread psychological evidence, and relied on speculative alternatives.
Federal Court dismissed judicial review of an H&C refusal, finding the officer’s reasons—though imperfect—were reasonable when read holistically.
The Federal Court dismissed an application for judicial review of an H&C refusal, finding the officer reasonably assessed establishment, hardship, and the daughter’s mental health.
Judicial review of a refused H&C permanent residence application was dismissed. The Court found the officer reasonably assessed best interests of the child and hardship.
The Federal Court granted judicial review of a refused H&C application, finding the officer failed to address central mental-health evidence and impermissibly assessed medical issues without expertise.
Judicial review of an H&C refusal was dismissed. The Court held the officer reasonably weighed establishment, family ties, country conditions, and hardship evidence.
Federal Court allowed judicial review of an H&C refusal, finding the officer unreasonably failed to address the applicant’s front-line shelter work during COVID-19.
Explore more
