Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Federal Court granted judicial review of an H&C refusal, finding the officer failed to engage with key evidence and relied on speculative reasoning.
The Federal Court allowed judicial review of a refusal of H&C permanent residence, finding the officer unreasonably assessed the grandchildren’s best interests.
Federal Court dismissed judicial review of an H&C refusal, finding the officer reasonably weighed establishment and hardship and that new evidence could not be considered.
The Federal Court granted judicial review of an H&C refusal, finding the officer unreasonably relied on the Ukraine ADR instead of conducting a proper individualized hardship assessment.
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of an H&C refusal, finding the officer reasonably assessed hardship, establishment, BIOC, and caregiver evidence.
Federal Court held that an H&C refusal was unreasonable because the officer failed to grapple with key evidence about family interdependence, children’s interests, and the applicant’s lived reality.
Judicial review of an H&C refusal and TRV denial was dismissed. The Court found the Officer’s global assessment reasonable, fresh evidence inadmissible, and no procedural unfairness.
The Federal Court allowed judicial review of an H&C refusal, finding the officer unreasonably failed to engage with evidence of efforts to regularize status.
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of an immigration officer’s refusal to reopen an H&C decision, finding the officer stayed at the first reconsideration stage and acted reasonably.
The Federal Court set aside a reconsideration decision on an H&C application, finding the officer used an incorrect legal lens and failed to address key evidence.
Explore more
