Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2018 BCSC 308

R. v. Perkins

The court dismissed an application to strike a production order after Garofoli disclosure added evidence linking the accused to trafficking and to a storage locker.

  • Production order
  • Reasonable grounds for belief
  • Information to obtain (ito)
  • Garofoli step 6 procedure
  • Informant reliability
  • Nexus to place (storage locker)
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2016 NSSC 343

R. v. D.M.D.

The court held the Crown was not obliged to disclose the vetted SDRs relating to Sources A and C because those vetted SDRs were not placed before the authorizing justice and the Crown adduced credible evidence that the vetted SDR content was consistent with the affidavit and that withholding them does not give rise to a reasonable possibility of impairing the accused's right to make full answer and defence in the Garofoli/Production Order context; informer privilege and safety/redaction concerns supported nondisclosure and the Crown met its burden to justify refusal.

  • Stinchcombe disclosure
  • Garofoli application
  • Source handler notes
  • Source debriefing reports
  • Production order
  • Third-party production
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2016 BCCA 391

R. v. McKay

Appeal from an order requiring disclosure of informer-related police notes and debrief reports. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the disclosure order, and ordered a new trial.

  • Stinchcombe disclosure
  • Garofoli application
  • Informer privilege
  • O'connor third-party production
  • Section 8 charter
  • Section 24(2) charter
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2016 BCCA 126

R. v. McKay

The Court of Appeal for British Columbia allowed the Attorney General of British Columbia to intervene in an appeal about disclosure of informer intelligence.

  • Disclosure of police informant information
  • Judicial stay of proceedings
  • First-party disclosure obligations
  • Intervention in criminal appeals
  • Criminal-disclosure
  • Informer-privilege
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2015 BCSC 1659

R. v. Edwardsen

The court dismissed a Basi application for in-camera review of redacted informant materials, finding the accused had not shown the required reasonable likelihood of assistance.

  • Basi procedure
  • Garofoli review
  • Information to obtain (ito)
  • Source handler notes (shns) and source debrief reports (sdrs)
  • Reasonable likelihood threshold for in-camera review
  • Vetting/redaction of confidential informant materials
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2014 BCSC 399

R. v. McKinnon

The court ordered further disclosure of PRIME records about crown witness Eric Low, including names of associates, while preserving other personal redactions and leaving informer privilege unresolved.

  • Crown disclosure obligations
  • Stinchcombe doctrine
  • Prime police records
  • Witness credibility
  • Vetting and redaction
  • Publication ban
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2005 BCSC 852

R. v. Terezakis

The court limited defence questioning about disclosure and informer identity, allowing questions on general document classes but forbidding specific documents that might reveal a confidential informant.

  • Disclosure obligations
  • Confidential informant identity
  • Voir dire
  • Admissibility of questioning
  • Criminal-evidence
  • Disclosure
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.