Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Tort 2023 BCSC 1882

Nijjer v. Bierman

The court found the first collision caused cervical radiculopathy and other injuries, and that later collisions aggravated them. The pilonidal cyst claim failed.

  • Causation
  • Damages
  • Non-pecuniary damages
  • Loss of earning capacity
  • Future care costs
  • Credibility and evidence assessment
Read case analysis
Personal injury 2022 BCSC 2178

Hobbs v. Rozon

Trial judgment in a British Columbia motor vehicle injury case awarding damages for past income loss, future earning capacity, non-pecuniary damages, future care and special damages.

  • Causation
  • Damages
  • Non-pecuniary damages
  • Loss of earning capacity
  • Future care
  • Failure to mitigate
Read case analysis
Personal injury 2022 BCSC 857

Buezo v. Ng

The court awarded damages to Ms. Buezo for chronic pain and psychological effects after a collision, including future earnings loss, housekeeping loss, care costs, and special damages.

  • Non-pecuniary damages
  • Loss of earning capacity
  • Housekeeping loss
  • Future cost of care
  • Credibility assessment
  • Mitigation
Read case analysis
Tort 2022 BCSC 545

Hachey v. Thomas

The court awarded damages for injuries from a motor vehicle accident, including chronic headaches, cognitive and psychological impairment, wage loss, and future care.

  • Non-pecuniary damages
  • Loss of housekeeping capacity
  • Past wage loss
  • Future earning capacity
  • Costs of future care
  • Causation
Read case analysis
Tort 2021 BCSC 1254

Pham v. Lee

Two admitted motor vehicle accidents caused ongoing soft-tissue injuries to a nurse. The court awarded damages for pain, wage loss, future earning capacity, care, and specials.

  • Non-pecuniary damages
  • Past wage loss
  • Future earning capacity
  • Cost of future care
  • Apportionment
  • Causation
Read case analysis
Torts 2021 BCSC 238

Hadley v. Pabla

Motor vehicle accident damages trial. The court awarded the plaintiff $162,044.94 for chronic right knee pain, lost earning capacity, future care, and special damages.

  • Damages assessment
  • Loss of earning capacity
  • Non-pecuniary damages
  • Mitigation
  • Costs of future care
  • Special damages
Read case analysis
Personal injury 2019 BCSC 2239

Watts v. Lindsay

The court awarded damages for motor vehicle accident injuries, including chronic pain and major depressive disorder, and rejected a failure-to-mitigate reduction.

  • Non-pecuniary damages
  • Past wage loss
  • Future earning capacity
  • Loss of housekeeping capacity
  • Cost of future care
  • Mitigation
Read case analysis
Tort 2019 BCSC 81

McCully v. Moss

The court awarded damages after two admitted motor vehicle accidents caused chronic neck pain and headaches, but rejected a housekeeping award and greatly limited income-loss claims.

  • Non-pecuniary damages
  • Loss of earning capacity
  • Future care costs
  • Causation
  • Credibility
  • Adverse inference
Read case analysis
Tort 2018 BCSC 220

Dennstedt v. Lepine

Rear-end collision personal injury trial awarding $175,708.77 for soft tissue injuries, future earning capacity loss, future care, and special damages.

  • Soft tissue injury
  • Loss of earning capacity
  • General damages
  • Future care
  • Part 7 benefits
  • Mitigation
Read case analysis
Tort 2016 BCSC 763

Jones v. McLerie

Assessment of damages for a rear-end motor vehicle accident. The court awarded general damages and future earning-capacity damages for persistent low back pain.

  • Non-pecuniary damages
  • Loss of earning capacity
  • Causation
  • Mitigation
  • Medical evidence
  • Non-pecuniary-damages
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.