Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Federal Court dismissed a mandamus application over delayed Gaza TRV processing, finding biometrics remained outstanding and the delay was not shown to be unreasonable.
The Federal Court partly allowed an ATIA application over historic intelligence records, ordered disclosure of several pages, remitted one discretion issue, and awarded costs.
The Federal Court partly granted a Canada Evidence Act s. 38 application, confirming some redactions, allowing some disclosure with summaries, and imposing conditions for use of the documents.
The Federal Court confirmed a Canada Evidence Act section 38 non-disclosure order in William Robert Majcher’s prosecution, finding the withheld material injurious and its disclosure not justified.
The Federal Court applied the Canada Evidence Act s. 38 regime, confirming non-disclosure for some redactions and ordering limited summaries and lifted wording for others.
The Federal Court partly allowed a Canada Evidence Act s. 38 application, confirming many disclosure bans and allowing some information to be disclosed through court-approved summaries.
The Federal Court dismissed Sakab’s motion seeking production of a proffer in a section 38 Canada Evidence Act proceeding and held the statutory process could continue.
The Federal Court confirmed a Canada Evidence Act s. 38 prohibition on disclosure of redacted memorandum material, finding probable injury to international relations.
The Federal Court upheld redactions in access-to-information records about Canada’s response to the Marlin Mine dispute and dismissed Shin Imai’s judicial review.
The Court applied reasonableness review under Vavilov, concluded section 6 does not require re‑satisfaction of the section 4 preconditions for each extension, and held the Governor in Council’s decision to extend the Ukraine regulations was reasonable and therefore valid.
Source excerpt
Explore more
