Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure 2023 BCSC 2245

Teal Cedar Products Ltd. v. Rainforest Flying Squad

The court set aside default judgments against two self-represented defendants, finding their delay understandable and relief justified while the pleading was still defective.

  • Setting aside default judgment
  • Supreme court civil rules
  • Pleadings
  • Case management
  • Self-represented litigants
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2016 BCSC 2066

Harden v. Katerberg

Assessment of special costs arising from a joinder application. The registrar reduced the fees claimed and awarded Marti Katerberg $60,000 plus taxes, plus disbursements and assessment costs.

  • Special costs
  • Assessment of costs
  • Proportionality
  • Reasonableness of fees
  • Joinder of a party
  • Special-costs
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2015 BCSC 1823

West Bros. Frame & Chair Ltd. v. Yazbek

The court held that proposed defendants must be served with notice of an application to add them as parties; the matter was adjourned generally for failure of service.

  • Rule 8-1(7) - notice to affected persons
  • Rule 6-2(7)-(8) - adding parties and variation/discharge
  • Application to add defendants
  • Service requirements
  • Service-of-process
  • Joinder
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2014 BCSC 1131

Patterson v. Bodman

The court set aside an earlier order adding Patricia Nielsen as a further third party, noting the matter was close to trial and an immediate decision was needed.

  • Application to add further third party
  • Setting aside order
  • Costs
  • Civil-procedure
  • Third-party-practice
  • Joinder
Read case analysis
Torts 2012 BCSC 1193

Colson v. Vancouver Coastal Health

The court upheld the joinder of Dr. Edward Gofton in a medical negligence action, finding the amended pleadings stated a potential claim and joinder was just and convenient.

  • Joinder under rule 6-2(7)
  • Pleadings sufficiency
  • Statute of limitations
  • Just and convenient test
  • Shotgun pleading
  • Joinder
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2012 BCSC 616

Krafta v. F.L.E.X. Excavating Ltd.

The court awarded costs to a proposed defendant who successfully resisted joinder, but ordered those costs payable at the end of the proceeding.

  • Application to add party
  • Costs of interlocutory application
  • Costs payable to non-parties
  • Service of application materials
  • Timing of costs
  • Double indemnification
Read case analysis
Family law 2012 ONCA 246

Gacanin v. Macedo

The Court dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the trial judge that Be There Promotions 2006 and John Tasikas are not necessary and proper parties because the appellant does not claim an interest in Be There but only seeks a monetary equalization payment; therefore joinder of those parties was unnecessary.

  • Necessary and proper party
  • Equalization payment
  • Limitation period (procedural)
  • Joinder/party status
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2009 ONCA 431

D & A v. Groothuis

Truemner is not a necessary party under rule 5.03 because the claim against the former articling student does not implicate her rights and her evidence, if any, would relate only to quantification which is insufficient to justify joinder.

  • Necessary party
  • Rule 5.03
  • Joinder
  • Quantification of damages
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2009 BCCA 194

Hightime Investments Pty. Ltd. v. Bromley

Application for leave to appeal dismissed. The Court held the chambers judge’s key reason was failure to join and serve CIC, while residual-discretion comments were obiter.

  • Set aside default judgment
  • Leave to appeal
  • Service of process
  • Residual discretion
  • Non-joinder
  • Leave-to-appeal
Read case analysis
Tort 2007 BCSC 1706

Forde v. Interior Health Authority

The court dismissed an application to join additional doctors in a medical negligence action, holding the pleadings were too general to show a viable cause of action.

  • Joinder of parties
  • Pleadings specificity
  • Limitation periods
  • Rule 15(5)(a)(iii)
  • Joinder-of-parties
  • Pleadings-specificity
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.