Abel v. Harlton
Boundary dispute between ŃĐŸŃĐ”ĐŽĐœĐžĐ” property owners in Victoria: the court held the defendant bears the shortfall, admitted survey evidence, and granted a limited easement with compensation.
- Boundary dispute
- Indefeasible title
- Nemo dat quod non habet
- Expert evidence admissibility
- Easement under property law act s.36
- Misdescription of boundaries