Schaufelberger v. Cannon
The claimant's application to set aside the 2009 Family Law Agreement was time‑barred under s.198(3) FLA and, on the merits, the agreement was not set aside because negotiation was not procedurally unfair and the agreement is not significantly unfair under s.93(5). The Family Law Agreement therefore governs; however, the court recognized implied partnership obligations and awarded the claimant compensation for post‑separation sweat equity and management, ordered specific reimbursements for a non‑partnership LOC withdrawal and for the claimant's cash infusion, allocated responsibility for the…
Source excerpt
- Setting aside family agreement (s.93 fla)
- Indefeasible title and rebuttal
- Limitation and discoverability
- Partition and sale of property
- Compensation for management / sweat equity
- Accounting