Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Because both parties jointly requested the limited extension, the mediator accepted the timing, and the request was on consent, the Tribunal amended the scheduling order to extend the mediation brief deadline to February 20, 2026.
Source excerpt
The court held the mediated settlement in a civil forfeiture case was binding, finding no unconscionability, no inequality of bargaining power, and no improvidence.
Family trial addressing divorce, parenting, child support, and property division. The court granted the divorce, ordered shared parenting, awarded retroactive and prospective support, and dismissed the respondent’s property claim.
The court held the July 2021 mediation agreement was not binding because key terms remained unresolved. It also said the agreement would be set aside under s. 93 if needed.
The court enforced the separation agreement, awarded spousal support and bonus arrears in part, and reviewed support to a reduced term ending in 2027.
The court varied child support and section 7 apportionment, accepted averaged Guidelines income due to fluctuating business earnings, and declined blanket disclosure orders.
The court held that a mediated Memorandum of Understanding was a binding settlement, and granted a declaration that the parties must proceed to a separation agreement.
The court dismissed Alio’s application to postpone mandatory mediation in a class proceeding, holding that pre-certification mediation was neither unfair nor impracticable.
In a family-law interim application, the court refused an immediate sale of the former family home, ordered mediation fees paid upfront by the respondent, and granted disclosure and other interim relief.
The Landlord failed to prove a post-mediation breach with the specificity and supporting documentation required by s.16(4); the Director erred by relying principally on an inadequately detailed DR3 without seeking additional information as permitted and required by s.16(6)(a), therefore the Director's order for vacant possession was set aside and the mediated settlement remains in effect.
Source excerpt
Explore more
