Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure 2026 BCCA 157

Genesis Mortgage Investment Corp. v. Blais

Leave to appeal was granted and a stay ordered because the issue of whether a lender awarded indemnity costs in foreclosure can be compelled to disclose privileged legal invoices and submit to an assessment before redemption is novel and important, the appeal has arguable merit, Genesis would suffer irreparable harm from an immediate waiver of solicitor‑client privilege, and the balance of convenience favoured a stay given the respondents' protections and concessions.

  • Indemnity costs
  • Assessment of costs
  • Right of redemption
  • Stay of execution
  • Waiver of privilege
Read case analysis
Civil 2025 ONCA 759

Equitable Bank c. Bitchoka

La Cour d’appel de l’Ontario refuse un sursis Ă  l’expulsion en attendant l’appel et accorde des dĂ©pens Ă  la banque sur une base d’indemnisation substantielle.

  • Stay pending appeal
  • Summary judgment
  • Mortgage power of sale
  • Balance of convenience
  • Costs
  • Sursis-en-attendant-lappel
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2025 BCSC 2327

Ni v. Liu

The court dismissed Hui Liu and ZF Farm Ltd.’s attempt to revisit an adjournment order, declared them vexatious litigants, and awarded special costs to Ming Yu Ni.

  • Adjournment
  • Vexatious litigant order
  • Special costs
  • Abuse of process
  • Collateral attack on orders
  • Self‑represented litigant conduct
Read case analysis
Property law 2025 BCSC 1216

SpringCreek Capital Corp. v. Full Spectrum Medical Inc.

The court approved SpringCreek’s $650,000 sale of ALR property after 19 months of marketing and dismissed Chase’s preservation application.

  • Conduct of sale
  • Provident sale
  • Preservation order
  • Mortgage priority dispute
  • Market valuation
  • Building code compliance
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2025 BCSC 772

Amur Capital Income Fund Inc. v. 1365650 B.C. Ltd

The court set aside an order nisi in a foreclosure matter after defective substituted service, premature hearing, and prejudicial interest-rate error.

  • Service of process
  • Substituted service
  • Common law service
  • Irregularity under rule 22-7
  • Slip rule (rule 13-1(17))
  • Interest act compliance
Read case analysis
Civil 2025 BCSC 1281

Dhillon v. Tennant

The court dismissed a stay application in a foreclosure matter, finding no arguable appeal, no irreparable harm, and that the balance of convenience favoured purchasers.

  • Stay pending appeal
  • Vacant possession
  • Order for sale
  • Balance of convenience
  • Irreparable harm
  • Bona fide purchaser
Read case analysis
Contract 2025 BCSC 162

Aujla v. 0775740 B.C. Ltd.

The court addressed a failed Royal Bay joint venture, finding the agreement was partly oral and partly written and that the parties were personally bound as co-venturers and co-obligors.

  • Joint venture
  • Contribution and indemnity between co-obligors
  • Accounting of contributions
  • Fraudulent conveyance
  • Breach of fiduciary duty
  • Parol evidence and partly oral contracts
Read case analysis
Civil 2024 BCSC 2358

First Circle Mortgage Investment Corporation v. Movassaghi

The court dismissed an appeal from approval of a foreclosure sale, holding the mortgagee marketed the property in a businesslike manner and the $1.895 million price was provident.

  • Order approving sale
  • Businesslike marketing
  • Provident sale
  • Appraisal vs market evidence
  • Standard of review (correctness)
  • Foreclosure-sale-approval
Read case analysis
Contract 2024 NSSC 121

AG(NS) v. Ernst

The Confirmatory Order of September 9, 2020 vested possession and title of 44 Jackson Drive in CIBC, which, given the promissory notes required continued ownership and occupation, established a breach that the Defence cannot reasonably contest on the pleadings; the prior court order may be relied upon as a public record on a motion under Rule 13.03, therefore the Defence discloses no sustainable defence and summary judgment for the Plaintiff is warranted.

  • Forgivable loan forgiveness conditions
  • Summary judgment on pleadings
  • Collateral attack on court order
  • Equity of redemption
  • Confirmatory foreclosure order
  • Possession and title
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2023 BCCA 261

Dick v. Coquitlam (City)

Applications for extensions of time to appeal were dismissed, and the Court made a broad vexatious litigant order against Mr. Dick and related companies.

  • Extension of time to appeal
  • Vexatious litigant order
  • Res judicata
  • Summary judgment
  • Rule 9-6
  • Rule 9-7
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.