Jeffries v. Bayfield Mortgage Investment Corp.
Given the lengthy unexplained delay, the appellant's failure to take steps to prosecute the appeal, and the lack of merit or realistic prospect of success for an appeal premised on a self-created 'Bonded Bill of Exchange Order' as lawful payment, it was not in the interests of justice to remove the appeal from the inactive list; the chambers judge did not err and the application to vary is dismissed.
Source excerpt
- Removal from inactive list
- Abandonment of appeal
- No-fee application
- Validity of payment (bonded bill of exchange)