Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Property law 2025 BCSC 837

0925470 B.C. Ltd. v. Ucluelet (District)

The court dismissed a statutory appeal and petition challenging a restrictive covenant tied to subdivision approval and rental housing conditions.

  • Restrictive covenant
  • Subdivision approval
  • Statutory appeal
  • Covenant cancellation/modification
  • Standard of review
  • Contractual interpretation
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2015 FC 1331

P & S Holdings Ltd. v. Canada

The Federal Court held adjacent landowners had no statutory or common-law right to participate in a medical marijuana licensing process, and dismissed the judicial review.

  • Procedural fairness
  • Standing
  • Licensing
  • Zoning
  • Mandamus
  • Procedural-fairness
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2015 BCSC 264

Stoneman v. Denman Island Local Trust Committee

The court struck pleadings attacking Bylaw No. 111 as barred by res judicata and issue estoppel, but allowed leave to amend tort claims in negligence, nuisance, and misfeasance in public office.

  • Misfeasance in public office
  • Negligence
  • Nuisance
  • Res judicata
  • Issue estoppel
  • Development permit
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2009 BCSC 1334

Costello v. Hornby Island Local Trust Committee

The plaintiff’s claims against the Islands Trust and its trustees were dismissed after the court found no misfeasance, negligence, breach of trust, mental distress, or basis for punitive damages.

  • Misfeasance in public office
  • Negligence
  • Breach of trust
  • Mental distress damages
  • Punitive damages
  • Siting and use permits
Read case analysis
Administrative law 1994 NSCA 119

Ducolon v. Mountain Ash Court Property Owners Association

The Court upheld the trial judge: respondents, as neighbouring owners, had standing; their delay was reasonably explained and did not bar relief; the development officer exceeded jurisdiction because s.19(b) of By‑Law C‑357 requires that inability to increase a lot's size be caused by adjacent buildings or other physical impediments (physical features), not merely ownership of adjacent lots, therefore the permits and the officer's decision were properly quashed and the mandatory injunction upheld.

  • Certiorari
  • Mandamus
  • Development permits
  • Standing
  • Statutory interpretation of by‑law 19(b)
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.