R. v. Majcher
Although re-election to a judge-alone trial reduces some risks of moral and reasoning prejudice, the proposed similar fact evidence offers only modest probative value and would still create significant prejudice: documentary material would distract the trial, risk a trial-within-a-trial, and likely compel the accused to testify; therefore the evidence remains inadmissible and the Crown's reconsideration application is dismissed.
Source excerpt
- Similar fact evidence
- Reconsideration of evidentiary ruling
- Judge-alone trial
- Propensity reasoning
- Prejudicial effect vs probative value