Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The court granted the father's relocation application, ordering the children to live with him in Calgary and setting parenting-time and decision-making terms.
The father's unilateral denial of the mother's contact after the May 16, 2022 Consent Order constituted a material change in circumstances and amounted to parental alienation; on a fresh best interests inquiry the child’s primary care and residence, and decision-making authority, were placed with the mother, with specified parenting time to the father and child support ordered from the father to the mother.
Source excerpt
The court decided a high-conflict parenting dispute, admitted Soberlink reports as business records, ordered continued BAC monitoring, and appointed a parenting coordinator.
The court enforced a 2019 oral child-support agreement, fixed arrears at $16,600, set ongoing support at $1,031 monthly, and ordered disclosure and costs.
Interim parenting orders were varied to increase the respondent’s time gradually, with shared parental responsibilities ordered and requests for final decision-making, exchange changes, address disclosure, and fines dismissed.
On the balance of probabilities the child’s best interests are served by remaining in the father's primary care and residence because the father provides greater stability and conciliatory communication, the mother’s practices and unresolved conduct raised credible risk to the child’s welfare and the parties cannot reliably cooperate; joint decision-making is unworkable so the father is appointed sole decision-maker.
Source excerpt
The court denied a mother's relocation request to move a child from Comox to Qualicum Beach, finding the move was not shown to be in the child's best interests.
Family law trial on child support, s. 7 expenses, property division, and spousal support. The court reapportioned corporate property 60/40 to M.N. and set support orders.
On a family law application, the court ordered a gradual move to equal parenting time, set prospective child support, and dismissed retroactive child and spousal support claims.
The court varied prior family orders to adopt equal shared parenting, imputed income to the respondent, and ordered retroactive child support and s. 7 expenses.
Explore more
