The court granted a family law summary trial in part, dividing McBride Property proceeds equally, imputing income, and ordering child and spousal support.
The court found that, on balance, the children were primarily in the mother's care for most years (2018, 2019, 2022-2025) with shared parenting in 2020 and 2021; the father's Line 15000 income did not always reflect funds available so the court attributed portions of the company's pre-tax profits to him for certain years under s.18; retroactive child support to October 7, 2018 through 2025 was appropriate; historic unpaid child support owed by the father net of amounts owing from the mother totaled $169,668.47, payable within 90 days; prospective child support was fixed at $3,515 per month an…
Source excerpt
Primary care vs shared parenting (40% threshold)
Imputing corporate pre-tax profit to personal income (s.18 guidelines)
On the totality of the evidence and the best interests of the children the court awarded primary care and sole decision-making authority to Hanna; found no parental alienation by the mother; found the father’s declared incomes were not reflective of his resources and imputed annual income of $125,000 to him under s.19 of the Guidelines; ordered prospective guideline child support of $1,709/month commencing October 1, 2025 and allocated section 7 expenses 64% father/36% mother; concluded applicant is entitled to spousal support in principle but declined to order payment given her achieved self…
The court ordered a phased increase in parenting time, dismissed a section 91 restraining order, fixed interim support, and made targeted disclosure orders.
Family trial judgment on parenting, support, property, spousal support and divorce. The court ordered split parenting, limited retroactive child support, equal division of property, and nominal spousal support.
The Court of Appeal set aside an ambiguous relocation clause and retroactive child support and s. 7 expense orders, remitting those issues to the trial court.
Family law trial on parenting, support, and property division. The court awarded the respondent sole decision-making, set child support, divided property, and denied spousal support.
Family-law chambers decision on child support, exchange location, and counselling. The court retroactively reduced support, credited overpayments, and set future support at $917 monthly.
The court fixed interim incomes, ordered child and spousal support, awarded retroactive child support, and made several parenting, conduct, arbitration, passport, and costs orders.