Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure 2025 BCSC 468

Red Branch Investments Limited v. Long

The court set aside its earlier costs decision and awarded the defendant costs at Scale B, holding that his perjury barred special costs but not ordinary costs.

  • Special costs
  • Disentitlement to costs
  • Setting aside judgment
  • Perjury consequences
  • Trial misconduct
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2017 ONCA 679

R. v. Pammett

The Court concluded the trial judge did not err in principle and the one-year consecutive sentence for contempt was not demonstrably unfit; the appellant was not entitled to conversion of the consecutive sentence to concurrent on the facts presented, so the sentence was upheld.

  • Contempt for refusal to testify
  • Double punishment/double jeopardy (issue of concurrent vs consecutive sentences)
  • Mitigating factors
  • Standard of appellate review for sentence
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2015 BCSC 1535

R. v. Robinson

Benjamin Robinson, a former RCMP corporal, was sentenced for perjury committed during the Braidwood Inquiry about Robert Dziekanski’s death.

  • Perjury by police officer
  • Sentencing principles
  • Mitigation and aggravation
  • Conditional sentence eligibility
  • Probation and community service
  • Victim impact
Read case analysis
Defamation 2014 BCSC 2333

Oreck v. Tremblett

The court refused to dismiss the action outright, struck or required amendment of unclear pleadings, and ordered an amended notice of civil claim to be filed by January 9, 2015.

  • Absolute privilege
  • Strike out (r.9-5)
  • Summary dismissal (r.9-7)
  • Particularization
  • Amended pleading
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2011 BCSC 14

R. v. Reyat

The court sentenced Inderjit Singh Reyat to 9 years for perjury arising from the Air India trial, crediting 17 months for pre-trial custody.

  • Perjury at trial
  • Plea agreement
  • Compellability of witness
  • Jury verdict implications for sentencing
  • Pre-trial custody credit
  • Perjury
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2010 BCSC 11

Uppal v. Rawlins

Costs awarded after trial: special costs against the Rawlins defendants, Scale B costs for the realtor defendants before March 27, 2009, and double Scale B costs after that date.

  • Special costs
  • Offer to settle (rule 37b)
  • Rule 18a summary trial
  • Double costs
  • Forgery and perjury
  • Special-costs
Read case analysis
Defamation 2003 BCCA 694

Griffith v. Cox

The Court of Appeal dismissed an application for an extension of time to file appeal materials, finding the proposed appeal had no realistic prospect of success.

  • Limitation periods
  • Witness immunity
  • Extension of time
  • Security for costs
  • Court of appeal practice
  • Extension-of-time
Read case analysis
Defamation 2003 BCSC 1039

Griffith v. Cox

The court struck out a defamation and malicious prosecution claim as statute-barred and unsupported, holding the challenged statements were privileged and no civil action lay for testimony in court.

  • Absolute privilege
  • Qualified privilege
  • Witness immunity
  • Statute of limitations (limitation act)
  • Summary disposal/strike out
  • Defamation
Read case analysis
Evidence C33131

Hallatt v. Williams

The Court upheld the motions judge's finding that the appellants failed to prove perjury: the taped conversation, even if referring to the respondent, and the proposed affidavits (which were not fresh) did not together constitute clear and cogent evidence of deliberate misleading; therefore the appeal was dismissed and costs awarded.

  • Perjury
  • Fresh evidence admissibility
  • Inference from recorded conversation
  • Standard of review on appeal
  • Costs assessment
  • Motion to quash
Read case analysis
Criminal law [1994] 2 SCR 5

R. v. Zazulak

The Supreme Court of Canada held that recantation during the same hearing does not negate a completed perjury offence, though it may matter for sentence.

  • Recantation
  • Intent to mislead
  • Completed offence
  • Defence to perjury
  • Sentencing mitigation
  • Perjury
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.