Summit Leasing Corporation v. Rutledge
The court held the collateral was not shown to be consumer goods under the PPSA, so s. 67 did not limit Summit’s remedies. Falco’s corporate ownership also took one asset outside s. 67.
- Ppsa s.67 seize-or-sue limitation
- Classification of goods (consumer goods vs equipment)
- Burden of proof on classification
- Registration of security interest
- Declaratory relief re security rights
- Ppsa-s-67