Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative law 2025 FC 2011

Steffes v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court granted judicial review of an RCMP grievance decision, finding the delay in a transfer was not reasonably explained and the policy interpretation lacked justification.

  • Judicial review
  • Standard of review - reasonableness
  • Interpretation of policy
  • Procedural fairness
  • Disclosure
  • Grievance process
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2022 FC 1080

Lachance v. Canada (Attorney General)

Judicial review was allowed because the RCMP adjudicator failed to identify the governing policy or explain why it barred the requested remedies.

  • Judicial review
  • Reasonableness standard (vavilov)
  • Remedies (damages and corrective measures)
  • Jurisdiction of administrative decision-maker
  • Remittal for redetermination
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2021 FC 443

McGillivray v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court upheld an RCMP conduct decision finding that an officer failed to obey a lawful direction to submit leave by a deadline.

  • Judicial review
  • Standard of review - reasonableness
  • Rcmp code of conduct
  • Lawful orders and directions
  • Procedural fairness
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2021 FC 421

Podmoroff v. Canada (Attorney General)

Federal Court quashes an RCMP promotion grievance decision, finding the final-level adjudicator’s confirmation unreasonable because the process was tainted by reasonable apprehension of bias.

  • Promotion grievance
  • Bias and reasonable apprehension
  • Procedural fairness
  • Standard of review - reasonableness
  • Remedies and costs
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2021 FCA 80

Zak v. Canada (Attorney General)

Applying binding authority that reasonableness is the standard of review, the Court found no applicable Vavilov exceptions and concluded the Level II adjudicator provided reasoned explanations supported by the evidentiary record; the Standing Orders were treated as valid law on the books and their vires was not challenged, and therefore the appeal is dismissed.

  • Standard of review
  • Reasonableness
  • Vavilov exceptions
  • Rcmp standing orders
  • Procedural fairness
  • Vires/challenge to statutory instruments
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2019 ONCA 1025

Canadian Broadcasting Corporation v. Ferrier

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, concluding the decision maker erred by failing to consider the s.2(b) Charter right recognized as applying to police services board meetings (per Langenfeld) when ordering a closed s.83(17) extension hearing; although Dagenais/Mentuck does not extend to this purely administrative extension decision, the statutory presumption of openness in s.35(3) must be balanced with s.35(4) in light of s.2(b) using a proportionality/Doré approach; failure to consider the Charter is reviewable on correctness and required quashing of the in camera order and remittal fo…

  • Open court principle
  • Freedom of expression (s.2(b) charter)
  • Dagenais/mentuck publication ban test
  • Police services act s.35(3)-(4) and s.83(17)
  • Standard of review (vavilov)
  • Judicial review and remedies
Read case analysis
Tort 2006 BCSC 1857

Bagnell v. Taser International, Inc.

The court dismissed the Vancouver Police Board’s strike application, holding it was not plain and obvious the Board owed no duty of care in relation to supplying tasers to police officers.

  • Duty of care
  • Proximity
  • Policy vs operational decisions
  • Public body liability
  • Rule 19(24)(a) strike application
  • Duty-of-care
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2003 FC 1250

Gordon v. Canada (Solicitor General)

The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of an RCMP disciplinary decision, upholding dismissal of a constable for disgraceful conduct involving a relationship of trust.

  • Judicial review
  • Standard of review - patent unreasonableness
  • Disciplinary sanction
  • Position of trust
  • Conflict of interest
  • Consent issues
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2002 FCT 831

Bonspille v. Mohawk Council of Kanesatake

The Federal Court allowed the Attorney General of Quebec to intervene in two judicial review applications about the Kanesatake Mohawk police force and the tripartite agreement.

  • Tripartite agreement interpretation
  • Intervention
  • Judicial review
  • Judicial-review
  • Federal-court-rules
  • Aboriginal-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.