Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Tribunal dismissed a CHRA complaint against the RCMP, finding the officers who reported the matter were municipal police seconded to CFSEU-BC, not RCMP members or agents.
Summary judgment was granted because there was no genuine issue of material fact and the plaintiffs failed to adduce necessary expert evidence to establish the applicable standard of care for a negligent investigation claim, meaning their claim had no real chance of success; additionally the plaintiffs did not plead defamation and therefore could not pursue a defamation claim.
Source excerpt
The trial judge’s credibility finding that the arresting officer lacked subjective reasonable and probable grounds was decisive and entitled to deference; together with findings that objective grounds were weak and that the officer acted for an improper purpose (malice), these findings supported liability for malicious prosecution, false arrest and negligent investigation and warranted affirming the damages and costs awards.
Source excerpt
The court granted leave to intervene because the police associations have a real and identifiable interest and can provide useful legal and contextual perspectives on issues concerning the standard of care and policy implications, provided their participation is strictly limited by terms that prohibit raising new issues, adducing new evidence, or making submissions on the merits, and by imposing page and filing limits to avoid prejudice to the parties.
Source excerpt
The court held the RCMP owed no private law duty of care when releasing detainees from custody, so the negligence claim against the Minister was dismissed.
Court addressed document production disputes in a police-shooting civil action, limiting overbroad medical redactions and ordering non-party records produced subject to a Halliday review process.
In a motor vehicle negligence claim, the court apportioned liability 85% to the tow truck operator and 15% to the RCMP, and awarded damages for pain, care, and special losses.
The court dismissed claims for negligent investigation, wrongful arrest, and false imprisonment after finding the police had reasonable grounds to arrest based on the child complainant’s disclosures.
As the successful party the defendant is entitled to costs; although Tariff A generally applies, the court may award lump sum costs after assessing 'amount involved', complexity and trial length; given minor likely damages, lack of complexity and a two day trial a lump sum of $10,000 plus $2,000 per trial day is appropriate, and reasonable disbursements of $5,733.08 are recoverable.
Source excerpt
Wellington governs and precludes recognizing a private law duty of care owed by the police to family members of victims in relation to investigations; the appellants' factual differences did not establish the necessary proximity or special relationship and the pleadings disclosed no reasonable cause of action, so striking under Rule 21 without leave to amend was correct.
Source excerpt
Explore more
