T.E.R. v. S.M.
The application was dismissed because, on the facts, the pending s.211 assessment, the children's demonstrated emotional turmoil and academic difficulties, and the real risk that overseas travel would exacerbate a fragile parent-child dynamic or interfere with urgent reunification or other recommendations meant the risk of harm outweighed any educational or emotional benefit of the trip.
Source excerpt
- S.211 assessment
- Best interests of the child
- Parental decision-making
- Non-removal order
- Allegations of child sexual abuse
- Undue influence/alienation