Havelka v. Greenfield Construction Ltd.
The respondents established that the wharf reconstruction was authorised by federal statute, Greenfield acted as Canada’s agent and the nuisances complained of were either inevitable consequences of properly exercising statutory authority or were mitigated by reasonable steps taken; no actionable negligence was proven, and therefore Canada and Greenfield are not legally liable for the claimed nuisance.
Source excerpt
- Nuisance
- Statutory authority defence
- Crown immunity/agency
- Negligence
- Remedies and costs