B.A. v. J.F.
Motion dismissed because this Court lacks statutory authority under s.65.1 to stay the orders of other judges that simply dismissed the appeal, and alternatively the applicant failed the RJRâMacDonald stay test: the appeal lacked a serious prospect of success (adopting Justice Derrick's detailed reasons), the applicant did not demonstrate irreparable harm (no enforcement steps shown and assertions unsupported), and therefore the balance of convenience did not favor a stay.
Source excerpt
- Stay of execution
- Leave to appeal to supreme court of canada
- Dismissal for failure to perfect appeal
- Rjrâmacdonald stay test (serious issue, irreparable harm, balance of convenience)
- Ineffective assistance of counsel (allegation)
- Damages and costs