Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Employment law 2020 SST 224

EM v Canada Employment Insurance Commission

The General Division correctly applied s.10(4): the claimant failed to demonstrate that he did what a reasonable person in his situation would have done to determine EI entitlement for the entire delay period, and expectations of finding work or mistaken beliefs about eligibility do not constitute good cause; therefore the antedate was not warranted and the appeal fails.

  • Employment insurance benefits
  • Antedate under section 10(4)
  • Good cause for delay
  • Appeal standard of review
Read case analysis
Employment law 2014 SSTAD 254

K. M. v. Canada Employment Insurance Commission

Allow further time and grant leave to appeal because the Board communicated a 60-day time limit creating a reasonable expectation justifying extension, and because the Board failed to consider or apply s.51 of the Employment Insurance Regulations such that the appeal has a reasonable chance of success.

  • Employment insurance
  • Severance
  • Work-force reduction
  • Leave to appeal
  • Time limits
  • Reasonable expectation
Read case analysis
Employment insurance act 2012 TCC 223

Doucet v. M.N.R.

Given the evidence and new facts presented, including the appointment records, lack of substantiation that the worker actually worked 40 hours weekly, the disparity between recorded client hours and hours reported on the record of employment, and the overall assessment of remuneration, the Minister's decision that the employment was excluded under ss.5(2)(i) and 5(3)(b) was reasonable and was therefore confirmed.

  • Insurable employment
  • Related persons/deemed arm's length
  • Remuneration and reasonableness
  • Ministerial decision review
Read case analysis
Torts [1973] SCR 654

Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. Gill et al.

The Supreme Court of Canada held Canadian Pacific Ltd. and its driver solely liable for a fatal collision and ruled Canada Pension Plan benefits were not deductible from damages.

  • Negligence
  • Fatal accidents
  • Deduction of pension benefits from damages
  • Canada pension plan
  • Families' compensation act s.4(4)
  • Fatal-accidents
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.