Burke v. Bouris
The application to vary spousal maintenance was dismissed because the applicant failed to prove, on a balance of probabilities, a significant and long-lasting change not of his choice: the health issues were temporary or foreseeable and did not impair his ability to perform managerial work; the economic difficulties and unpaid devotion to a non-owned company were voluntary choices; bankruptcy discharge improved his financial position; and the recipient continued to demonstrate ongoing need.
Source excerpt
- Variation of spousal maintenance
- Change of circumstances
- Income determination
- Bankruptcy discharge effect
- Arrears and costs