Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
A strata corporation succeeded in a REDMA misrepresentation claim over promised renovations and reserve funding, and the director was held personally liable.
The court found the Province liable in negligence and the District and McLaughlins liable under the Water Act for flood damage, with damages reduced 25% for contributory negligence.
The appeal was dismissed because Curoc failed to prove 'loss or damages' required by s.30(5) OHSA (administrative and legal cost claims were inadequately evidenced or speculative), and absence of proven damages meant no genuine issue for trial under Rule 20.04(2)(a); declaratory relief was properly refused as the proposed declarations were speculative regarding future third‑party rights and lacked utility.
Source excerpt
The court held ICI liable for remediation costs at James Island, rejected limitation and exemption defenses, and awarded J.I. Properties $4.75 million.
By leasing the truck GMAC consented to the lessee's possession even though the lease prohibited operation; s.192(1) imposes owner liability where vehicle is in another's possession with the owner's consent and such statutory liability cannot be contracted out, therefore GMAC is vicariously liable for negligent operation by Simon.
Source excerpt
A horse escaped onto a highway and was struck by the plaintiff’s car. The court found both the horse owner and the driver negligent and apportioned liability 1/3 to the defendant and 2/3 to the plaintiff.
The court struck the Real Estate Act claim but allowed fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation claims to proceed, and granted 14 days to amend pleadings.
The Supreme Court of Canada allowed the appeal in a railway negligence case involving an injured child on an icy right of way, with damages to be apportioned.
The Supreme Court of Canada held both drivers negligent in a fog-related rear-end collision, apportioning liability equally and awarding damages on a 50/50 basis.
The Supreme Court of Canada held that a vehicle owner was liable under Quebec’s Highway Victims Indemnity Act despite workers’ compensation coverage, and it upheld reductions in damages.
Explore more
