Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2026 ONCA 290

R. v. Reeve

The Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed Daniel Reeve’s appeal from fraud and theft convictions arising from interconnected Ponzi schemes and rejected his expert-evidence arguments.

  • Fraud on the public
  • Ponzi scheme
  • Expert evidence admissibility and weight
  • Kienapple principle (double jeopardy for same delict)
  • Fraud-on-the-public
  • Ponzi-scheme
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2025 NSSC 390

R. v. Slauenwhite

Given the abuse of a position of trust, the contextual aggravation of committing the theft while awaiting sentence for prior thefts, and the serious victim impact, a custodial sentence would be justified for denunciation and deterrence; however the offender did not pose a danger to the community and met criteria for a conditional sentence. The court therefore imposed a 12-month conditional sentence on full house arrest with reduced community service of 150 hours, a 24-month probation order, a restitution order of $6,229.91, and employment prohibitions limiting access to administration of othe…

  • Section 334(a) theft over $5000
  • Section 718 purposes of sentencing
  • Aggravating factor: abuse of trust (s.718.2(a)(iii))
  • Victim impact (s.722(1))
  • Retroactivity/benefit of new sentencing regime (charter s.11(i))
  • Availability of conditional sentence post-amendment
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2025 ONCA 746

R. v. Wood

Ontario Court of Appeal considered a sentence appeal in a high-profile art theft and forgery case, addressing foreign authorities, conditional sentence arguments, and proportionality.

  • Art theft
  • Cultural property
  • Conditional sentence
  • Breach of trust
  • Mitigating and aggravating factors
  • Proportionality
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2024 NSSC 415

R v. Banks

The theft conviction was stayed under the Kienapple principle because it arose from the same acts as the fraud; s.380(1.1) mandatory minimum two-year imprisonment applies because the subject-matter value of the fraud (value put at risk by obtaining about 820,000 lbs of lobster) exceeded $1M even though actual proven loss was uncertain; a five-year custodial sentence is fit and proper given the magnitude, complexity and duration of the scheme, the significant impact on the victim, and the offender's prior similar convictions; ancillary orders including restitution and fine in lieu were limited…

  • Mandatory minimums
  • Conditional sentence
  • Suspended sentence
  • Aggravating and mitigating factors
  • Prohibition orders
  • Victim surcharge
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2023 BCSC 1945

R. v. Bornais

Sentencing for a long-running workplace fraud and theft by a dental receptionist. The court rejected a conditional sentence and imposed custody, probation, restitution and a 10-year prohibition order.

  • Fraud over $5,000
  • Breach of trust
  • Conditional sentence order (cso)
  • Probation
  • Prohibition order
  • Victim surcharge
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2023 BCSC 427

R. v. Soper

The Supreme Court of British Columbia dismissed Amanda Aileen Soper’s appeal from a theft conviction, holding the circumstantial evidence supported exclusive opportunity and the verdict was not unreasonable.

  • Circumstantial evidence
  • Exclusive opportunity
  • Standard of review
  • Particularity and ownership of charged property
  • Unreasonable verdict
  • Circumstantial-evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2022 NSSC 86

R. v. Baker

The court concluded that the only reasonable inference from the credible witness testimony and detailed banking records is that after an initial consented $200 e-transfer the accused used the victim's confidential banking information to effect 47 further unauthorized e-transfers totalling $10,247, thereby dishonestly depriving the victim; this satisfied the actus reus and mens rea for fraud and theft beyond a reasonable doubt.

  • Fraud by e-transfer
  • Circumstantial evidence
  • Credibility assessment
  • Mens rea
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2021 BCSC 1606

R. v. Doucet

Trial judgment on theft, drugs, weapons, and obstruction charges. The court convicted on theft, simple possession, and resisting arrest, but acquitted on trafficking, assault with a weapon, threats, and weapon-purpose charges.

  • W.(d.) credibility assessment
  • Circumstantial evidence and villaroman test
  • Self-defence (s.34)
  • Possession for the purpose of trafficking
  • Resisting/obstructing arrest (s.129)
  • Mens rea for possession of a weapon (s.88)
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2020 BCSC 2119

R. v. Jasper

Steven Jasper was sentenced for theft of a taxi, attempted robbery, and dangerous driving arising from a violent March 2017 incident in Vancouver.

  • Sentencing principles
  • Gladue factors
  • Diminished responsibility (drug reaction)
  • Credit for time served
  • Driving prohibition
  • Probation conditions
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2018 BCSC 2405

R. v. Elphicke

Sentencing reasons for Michael Gordon Elphicke after fraud, theft, and unauthorized lottery convictions involving OEHA funds and a planned hockey trip.

  • Fraud over $5,000
  • Theft over $5,000
  • Unauthorized lottery scheme
  • Conditional sentence (house arrest)
  • Restitution
  • Probation
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.