Gill et al. v. Zwicker
The adjudicator found the respondent intentionally misrepresented the wiring/billing arrangement, induced the appellants to sign the lease, and thereby liable for excess electricity costs; applying a reasoned apportionment the court awarded 66% of total electricity billed ($3,275.73), $200 for oil-outage related loss, and interest at 4% back to the date of breach ($404.01), totaling $3,910.89, and rejected the 15% rent claim as unsupported and constituting double recovery.
Source excerpt
- Misrepresentation
- Electricity billing allocation
- Failure to supply heat (oil)
- Assessment of damages
- Interest on awards