Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Intellectual property 2023 FC 2

GNR Travel Centre Ltd. v. CWI, Inc.

Federal Court dismissed consolidated trademark appeals, upholding refusal of the services claim, allowing goods use based on stickers on third-party RVs, and finding no confusion.

  • Use in association with goods
  • Registrability under s.30(b)
  • Likelihood of confusion (s.6)
  • Distinctiveness
  • Evidentiary burden
  • Standard of review
Read case analysis
Intellectual property 2021 FC 674

Beverly Hills Jewellers MFG Ltd. v. Corona Jewellery Company Ltd.

The Federal Court dismissed Beverly Hills Jewellers’ appeal, upheld refusal of two trade-mark applications, and found no palpable and overriding error in the TMOB’s confusion analysis.

  • Likelihood of confusion
  • Subsection 16(3) non-entitlement (proposed marks)
  • Subsection 6(5) confusion factors
  • Admission of new evidence on section 56 appeals
  • Standard of appellate review (housen/vavilov)
  • Trade-mark-confusion
Read case analysis
Intellectual property 2019 FC 1389

Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Wang

Summary trial decision finding repeated trademark and copyright infringement through counterfeit luxury goods, WeChat sales, and seized inventory; injunctions and damages were awarded.

  • Trade-marks act infringement
  • Passing off
  • Depreciation of goodwill
  • Copyright infringement and statutory damages
  • Anton piller order
  • Mareva injunction
Read case analysis
Intellectual property 2019 FC 1083

Zara Natural Stones Inc. v. Industria de Diseno Textil, S.A.

The Federal Court allowed the appeal, holding the Trade-marks Opposition Board unreasonably permitted a late amendment to an opposition pleading.

  • Likelihood of confusion
  • Leave to amend statement of opposition
  • Standard of review
  • Registrability
  • Entitlement to registration
  • Procedural fairness
Read case analysis
Intellectual property 2019 FCA 204

Sport Maska Inc. v. Bauer Hockey Ltd.

Rule 118 confers discretion on the Court; it does not mandate automatic dismissal for failure to comply with Rule 117 within 30 days. Case management and remedial rules permit validation or cure of procedural irregularities; substantive challenges to assignments may be decided on a Rule 117/118 motion but need not be and no reviewable error arose on the facts. Appeal dismissed and costs awarded to respondent.

  • Federal courts rules rule 117 and 118
  • Assignment of litigation
  • Procedural discretion and case management
  • Costs awards
  • Standard of review
Read case analysis
Intellectual property 2019 FC 882

Reusable Bag Industries Pty Ltd v. Gaisin

Federal Court allowed an appeal from the Registrar’s expungement of a trademark for non-use and ordered the registration reinstated.

  • Expungement for non-use
  • Use requirement
  • Extension of time
  • Reinstatement
  • Trade-mark-law
  • Non-use-expungement
Read case analysis
Intellectual property 2019 FC 743

8073902 Canada Inc. v. Vardy

The Federal Court expunged the DIAL-A-BOTTLE registration, finding the mark had lost distinctiveness by the start of the proceeding بسبب widespread use and ineffective enforcement.

  • Distinctiveness
  • Registrability
  • Expungement
  • Licensing and control (s.50)
  • Genericism
  • Market confusion
Read case analysis
Intellectual property 2019 FC 745

FCA US LLC v. Pentastar Transportation Ltd.

Federal Court dismissed FCA US LLC’s appeal from a section 45 trademark decision, upholding maintenance of the PENTASTAR registration for services and finding the evidence sufficient.

  • Use under section 45
  • Standard of review (reasonableness vs correctness)
  • Hearsay admissibility
  • Expungement procedure
  • Section 45 burden of proof
  • Trade-mark-law
Read case analysis
Intellectual property 2019 FC 571

Yeti Coolers, LLC v. Howsue Holdings Inc.

The Federal Court awarded Yeti Coolers a lump sum of $50,000 in costs after its successful trade-mark expungement application, citing the parties’ conduct and Rule 400(3).

  • Expungement
  • Costs assessment
  • Lump sum costs
  • Affidavit credibility
  • Party conduct
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Intellectual property 2019 FC 316

Yeti Coolers, LLC v. HowSue Holdings Inc.

The Federal Court expunged HowSue Holdings Inc.’s Tundra trade-mark registration, finding Yeti had prior use in Canada and the marks were confusing.

  • Expungement
  • Confusion
  • Distinctiveness
  • Use in canada
  • Registration entitlement
  • Subsection 6(5) factors
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.