Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure 2024 BCSC 1065

Adams v. Adams

The court struck a jury notice and dismissed a Rule 12-5(68) application to have damages heard by jury after liability had already been tried by judge alone.

  • Severance of issues
  • Mode of trial
  • Jury notice
  • Adjournment
  • Costs
  • Severance-of-issues
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2008 BCSC 1105

Mohammed v. Farenholtz

The plaintiff sought to strike a jury notice in a complex personal injury action. The court held the case was not shown to be too complex for a jury and dismissed the application.

  • Jury notice
  • Striking jury
  • Expert evidence
  • Complexity of evidence
  • Onus of proof
  • Credibility
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2006 BCSC 1642

Adamson v. Charity

The court struck the jury notice, finding the personal injury case involved complex, conflicting expert evidence and could not fairly be tried by jury.

  • Jury notice
  • Rule 39(27)
  • Expert evidence
  • Complexity of trial
  • Mode of trial
  • Jury-notice
Read case analysis
Personal injury 2006 BCSC 633

Li (Guardian ad litem of) v. Sandhu

The court refused to strike the defendants’ jury notice in a personal injury action, finding some complexity but not enough to remove the presumptive right to a jury.

  • Jury notice
  • Mode of trial
  • Expert evidence
  • Video surveillance
  • Credibility
  • Rule 35(4)
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2001 BCSC 914

Coulson v. Sra

The court struck a late jury notice as a nullity, finding it was filed outside the 21-day period after the original notice of trial and refusing leave to extend time.

  • Jury notice
  • Extension of time
  • Timeliness
  • Leave to file
  • Rule 39(26)
  • Rule 39(27)
Read case analysis
Tort [1929] SCR 598

Montreal Tramways Co. v. Brillant

The Supreme Court of Canada held there was enough evidence to go to the jury, upheld a new trial, and varied the order to make it workable.

  • Sufficiency of evidence to submit to jury
  • Motion to withdraw case before verdict
  • Order for new trial
  • Form and practicality of appellate directions
  • Sufficiency-of-evidence
  • Jury-trial
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.